一项旨在确定在儿童临床试验中应测量哪些结果的研究的系统评价。

A systematic review of studies that aim to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials in children.

作者信息

Sinha Ian, Jones Leanne, Smyth Rosalind L, Williamson Paula R

机构信息

Institute of Child Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2008 Apr 29;5(4):e96. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050096.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In clinical trials the selection of appropriate outcomes is crucial to the assessment of whether one intervention is better than another. Selection of inappropriate outcomes can compromise the utility of a trial. However, the process of selecting the most suitable outcomes to include can be complex. Our aim was to systematically review studies that address the process of selecting outcomes or outcome domains to measure in clinical trials in children.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We searched Cochrane databases (no date restrictions) in December 2006; and MEDLINE (1950 to 2006), CINAHL (1982 to 2006), and SCOPUS (1966 to 2006) in January 2007 for studies of the selection of outcomes for use in clinical trials in children. We also asked a group of experts in paediatric clinical research to refer us to any other relevant studies. From these articles we extracted data on the clinical condition of interest, description of the method used to select outcomes, the people involved in the selection process, the outcomes selected, and limitations of the method as defined by the authors. The literature search identified 8,889 potentially relevant abstracts. Of these, 70 were retrieved, and 25 were included in the review. These studies described the work of 13 collaborations representing various paediatric specialties including critical care, gastroenterology, haematology, psychiatry, neurology, respiratory paediatrics, rheumatology, neonatal medicine, and dentistry. Two groups utilised the Delphi technique, one used the nominal group technique, and one used both methods to reach a consensus about which outcomes should be measured in clinical trials. Other groups used semistructured discussion, and one group used a questionnaire-based survey. The collaborations involved clinical experts, research experts, and industry representatives. Three groups involved parents of children affected by the particular condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Very few studies address the appropriate choice of outcomes for clinical research with children, and in most paediatric specialties no research has been undertaken. Among the studies we did assess, very few involved parents or children in selecting outcomes that should be measured, and none directly involved children. Research should be undertaken to identify the best way to involve parents and children in assessing which outcomes should be measured in clinical trials.

摘要

背景

在临床试验中,选择合适的结局对于评估一种干预措施是否优于另一种干预措施至关重要。选择不恰当的结局可能会损害试验的效用。然而,选择最适合纳入的结局的过程可能很复杂。我们的目的是系统评价关于在儿童临床试验中选择要测量的结局或结局领域的过程的研究。

方法与结果

我们于2006年12月检索了Cochrane数据库(无日期限制);并于2007年1月检索了MEDLINE(1950年至2006年)、CINAHL(1982年至2006年)和SCOPUS(1966年至2006年)中关于儿童临床试验结局选择的研究。我们还请一组儿科临床研究专家向我们推荐任何其他相关研究。从这些文章中,我们提取了关于感兴趣的临床状况、用于选择结局的方法描述、参与选择过程的人员、选择的结局以及作者定义的方法局限性的数据。文献检索确定了8889篇潜在相关摘要。其中,70篇被检索到,25篇被纳入综述。这些研究描述了13个合作项目的工作,这些项目代表了包括重症监护、胃肠病学、血液学、精神病学、神经病学、小儿呼吸病学、风湿病学、新生儿医学和牙科等各种儿科专业。两组采用了德尔菲技术,一组采用了名义组技术,一组同时使用这两种方法就临床试验中应测量哪些结局达成共识。其他组采用半结构化讨论,一组采用基于问卷的调查。这些合作项目涉及临床专家、研究专家和行业代表。三组涉及受特定疾病影响儿童的父母。

结论

很少有研究涉及儿童临床研究结局的恰当选择,并且在大多数儿科专业中尚未开展相关研究。在我们评估的研究中,很少有研究让父母或儿童参与选择应测量的结局,并且没有一项研究直接让儿童参与。应该开展研究以确定让父母和儿童参与评估临床试验中应测量哪些结局的最佳方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652e/2346505/1df7ad9bb2be/pmed.0050096.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索