Suppr超能文献

使用口服避孕药的女性经前症状评估量表的比较。

Comparison of scales for evaluating premenstrual symptoms in women using oral contraceptives.

作者信息

Coffee Andrea L, Kuehl Thomas J, Sulak Patricia J

机构信息

Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Scott & White Memorial Hospital and Clinic, Texas A&M University Health Science Center College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2008 May;28(5):576-83. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.5.576.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare two scales used in research to evaluate daily premenstrual mood symptoms during use of a monophasic oral contraceptive.

DESIGN

Subanalysis of data from a prospective study.

SETTING

University-affiliated medical center. SUBJECTS; One hundred two reproductive-aged (18-48 yrs) women taking a monophasic oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and drospirenone in the standard 21-7 fashion (21 days of hormones followed by 7 days of placebo), and who had self-identified premenstrual symptoms of headache, mood changes, or pelvic pain.

INTERVENTION

Subjects completed a single-item questionnaire, the Scott & White Daily Diary of Symptoms, and a multiple-item questionnaire, the Penn State Daily Symptom Report (DSR), to assess their premenstrual symptoms. The Scott & White diary used a visual analog scale of 0-10 to assess pelvic pain, headache, and mood (a composite of anxiety, depression, and irritability). The Penn State DSR contained 17 items: 10 behavioral and seven physical components, each rated on a scale of 0-4, with one item that specifically rated mood swings.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Scores from the two scales were compared by using Spearman correlation coefficients, the Kendall W for concordance, and linear regression of ranked sums for study cycles. The Scott & White mood score significantly correlated with the total of the 17 items on the Penn State DSR, as well as the 10 behavioral items, the seven physical items, and the single mood-swing item (p<0.0001); specific coefficients of concordance were 0.44, 0.23, 0.10, and 0.28, respectively, and R2 values were 0.39, 0.39, 0.30, and 0.34, respectively. The daily Scott & White mood score was positively correlated with all 17 elements of the Penn State DSR (0.25-0.57). The greatest correlation was seen with the mood-swing element. Both instruments demonstrated the same patterns during the 21-7 oral contraceptive cycle, with symptoms increasing immediately before and peaking during the 7-day hormone-free interval.

CONCLUSION

A single-item daily mood score using a rating scale of 0-10 was concordant with a relatively complex 17-element symptom index and demonstrated the same pattern of change during cycles of oral contraception. The simple scoring system offers an advantage, especially in clinical studies of long duration.

摘要

研究目的

比较两种用于研究的量表,以评估在使用单相口服避孕药期间的每日经前情绪症状。

设计

对一项前瞻性研究的数据进行子分析。

地点

大学附属医疗中心。

研究对象

102名生育年龄(18 - 48岁)的女性,她们以标准的21 - 7方式服用含有炔雌醇和屈螺酮的单相口服避孕药(21天服用激素,随后7天服用安慰剂),且自我认定有经前头痛、情绪变化或盆腔疼痛症状。

干预措施

受试者完成一份单项问卷(斯科特与怀特症状每日日记)和一份多项问卷(宾夕法尼亚州立大学每日症状报告,DSR),以评估她们的经前症状。斯科特与怀特日记使用0 - 10的视觉模拟量表来评估盆腔疼痛、头痛和情绪(焦虑、抑郁和易怒的综合表现)。宾夕法尼亚州立大学DSR包含17个项目:10个行为项目和7个身体项目,每个项目按0 - 4评分,还有一个专门评估情绪波动的项目。

测量指标及主要结果

使用斯皮尔曼相关系数、肯德尔W一致性系数以及研究周期的秩和线性回归对两种量表的得分进行比较。斯科特与怀特情绪评分与宾夕法尼亚州立大学DSR的17个项目总和、10个行为项目、7个身体项目以及单个情绪波动项目显著相关(p<0.0001);具体的一致性系数分别为0.44、0.23、0.10和0.28,R²值分别为0.39、0.39、0.30和0.34。斯科特与怀特每日情绪评分与宾夕法尼亚州立大学DSR的所有17个要素呈正相关(0.25 - 0.57)。与情绪波动要素的相关性最强。在21 - 7口服避孕药周期中,两种工具都呈现出相同的模式,症状在7天无激素间隔期前立即增加并达到峰值。

结论

使用0 - 10评分量表的单项每日情绪评分与相对复杂的17要素症状指数一致,并且在口服避孕药周期中呈现出相同的变化模式。这种简单的评分系统具有优势,尤其是在长期的临床研究中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验