Schutter D J L G
Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Psychol Med. 2009 Jan;39(1):65-75. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708003462. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
BACKGROUND: For more than a decade high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in search of an alternative treatment for depression. The aim of this study was to provide an update on its clinical efficacy by performing a meta-analysis involving double-blind sham-controlled studies. METHOD: A literature search was conducted in the databases PubMed and Web of Science in the period between January 1980 and November 2007 with the search terms 'depression' and 'transcranial magnetic stimulation'. Thirty double-blind sham-controlled parallel studies with 1164 patients comparing the percentage change in depression scores from baseline to endpoint of active versus sham treatment were included. A random effects meta-analysis was performed to investigate the clinical efficacy of fast-frequency rTMS over the left DLPFC in depression. RESULTS: The test for heterogeneity was not significant (QT=30.46, p=0.39). A significant overall weighted mean effect size, d=0.39 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25-0.54], for active treatment was observed (z=6.52, p<0.0001). Medication resistance and intensity of rTMS did not play a role in the effect size. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that high-frequency rTMS over the left DLPFC is superior to sham in the treatment of depression. The effect size is robust and comparable to at least a subset of commercially available antidepressant drug agents. Current limitations and future prospects are discussed.
背景:十多年来,高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)已被应用于左侧背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC),以寻找抑郁症的替代治疗方法。本研究的目的是通过进行一项涉及双盲假对照研究的荟萃分析,提供其临床疗效的最新信息。 方法:在1980年1月至2007年11月期间,在PubMed和Web of Science数据库中进行文献检索,检索词为“抑郁症”和“经颅磁刺激”。纳入了30项双盲假对照平行研究,共1164例患者,比较了活性治疗与假治疗从基线到终点时抑郁评分的变化百分比。进行随机效应荟萃分析,以研究左侧DLPFC高频rTMS治疗抑郁症的临床疗效。 结果:异质性检验无显著性差异(QT = 30.46,p = 0.39)。观察到活性治疗有显著的总体加权平均效应量,d = 0.39 [95%置信区间(CI)0.25 - 0.54](z = 6.52,p < 0.0001)。药物抵抗和rTMS强度对效应量无影响。 结论:这些发现表明,左侧DLPFC高频rTMS治疗抑郁症优于假治疗。效应量稳健,至少与一部分市售抗抑郁药物相当。讨论了当前的局限性和未来前景。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2001
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010-2-23
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003-10
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024-7-24
Am J Psychiatry. 2025-6-1
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2025