Suppr超能文献

低频(1赫兹)右侧前额叶重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)与文拉法辛缓释剂治疗难治性抑郁症的比较:一项双盲、单中心、随机研究

Low frequency (1-Hz), right prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) compared with venlafaxine ER in the treatment of resistant depression: a double-blind, single-centre, randomized study.

作者信息

Bares Martin, Kopecek Miloslav, Novak Tomas, Stopkova Pavla, Sos Peter, Kozeny Jiri, Brunovsky Martin, Höschl Cyril

机构信息

Prague Psychiatric Centre, Ustavni 91, Prague 8 - Bohnice, 181 03, Czech Republic.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2009 Nov;118(1-3):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.01.032. Epub 2009 Feb 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of depression. This double-blind study compared efficacy of l Hz rTMS over the right prefrontal dorsolateral cortex with venlafaxine ER in the treatment of resistant depression.

METHODS

A total of 60 inpatients with depressive disorder (DSM-IV criteria), who previously did not respond to at least one antidepressant treatment, were randomly assigned to 1 Hz rTMS with placebo and venlafaxine ER with sham rTMS for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure was score change in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). We also used Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and Beck Depressive. Inventory-Short Form (BDI-SF). The response was defined as a >or=50% reduction of MADRS score.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between treatment groups in MADRS (p=0.38), BDI-SF (p=0.56) and CGI (p=0.17) scores from baseline to endpoint. Response rates for rTMS (33%) and venlafaxine (39%) as well as remission (MADRS score<or=10 points) rates (19% vs. 23%) and drop-out rate did not differ between treatment groups. There were significant reductions of MADRS, CGI and BDI-SF scores in both groups.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size. No placebo arm was included for ethical reasons, because both treatments have previously been reported to be more effective than placebo. Relatively short duration of antidepressant treatment.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that, at least in the acute treatment, the right sided rTMS produces clinically relevant reduction of depressive symptomatology in patients with resistant depression comparable to venlafaxine ER. Larger sample sizes are required to confirm these results.

摘要

背景

既往研究表明重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗抑郁症有效。本双盲研究比较了1赫兹rTMS作用于右侧前额叶背外侧皮质与文拉法辛缓释剂治疗难治性抑郁症的疗效。

方法

总共60例符合抑郁障碍(DSM-IV标准)的住院患者,此前至少对一种抗抑郁药治疗无反应,被随机分配接受1赫兹rTMS加安慰剂以及文拉法辛缓释剂加假rTMS治疗4周。主要结局指标为蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评分变化。我们还使用了临床总体印象量表(CGI)和贝克抑郁问卷简版(BDI-SF)。反应被定义为MADRS评分降低≥50%。

结果

从基线到终点,治疗组在MADRS(p = 0.38)、BDI-SF(p = 0.56)和CGI(p = 0.17)评分方面无显著差异。治疗组之间rTMS的有效率(33%)和文拉法辛的有效率(39%)、缓解率(MADRS评分≤10分)(19%对23%)以及脱落率均无差异。两组的MADRS、CGI和BDI-SF评分均有显著降低。

局限性

样本量小。出于伦理原因未设安慰剂组,因为此前报道两种治疗均比安慰剂更有效。抗抑郁治疗持续时间相对较短。

结论

本研究结果表明,至少在急性治疗中,右侧rTMS在难治性抑郁症患者中产生的抑郁症状临床相关减轻程度与文拉法辛缓释剂相当。需要更大样本量来证实这些结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验