Suppr超能文献

最后通牒博弈中血小板血清素含量与对不公平提议拒绝之间的关系。

Relationship between platelet serotonin content and rejections of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.

作者信息

Emanuele Enzo, Brondino Natascia, Bertona Marco, Re Simona, Geroldi Diego

机构信息

Interdepartmental Center for Research in Molecular Medicine (CIRMC), University of Pavia, Viale Taramelli 24, I-27100 Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

Neurosci Lett. 2008 May 30;437(2):158-61. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.04.006. Epub 2008 Apr 8.

Abstract

The ultimatum game (UG), a well-studied decision task used in experimental neuroeconomics, represents a simple two-person bargaining between a proposer and a responder. The proposer offers the responder how to split a sum of money. The responder decides whether to accept or reject the offer. When the responder accepts it, each player earns money according to the proposer's offer. If the offer is rejected, neither player gets anything. Rejections of "free" money in the UG represent a deviation from the standard economic model of rationality. This behaviour could be linked to adverse psychological reactions to unfair offers, including anger, hostility and impulsiveness. Currently, it is believed that the most plausible biological system related to anger and impulsivity is the serotonergic system. We hypothesize that serotonergic activity, as measured by platelet serotonin levels, will differentiate subjects who either reject or accept low UG offers. A sample of 60 economy students (31 males and 29 females, mean age: 24.4+/-2.3 years) was investigated. As predicted, the mean platelet serotonin level was significantly lower in participants who reject unfair offers (euro 1 out of euro 10) than in those who accept (2.86+/-0.13 versus 3.48+/-0.11 nmol/10(9) platelets, respectively, p<0.001). We conclude that low platelet serotonin may serve as a reliable biomarker to identify people who are more likely to reject unfair ultimatum offers in an experimental neuroeconomic setting. Our pilot data seem to indicate that the serotonergic system may play an important role in the UG rejection behaviour.

摘要

最后通牒博弈(UG)是实验神经经济学中一项经过充分研究的决策任务,它代表了提议者和回应者之间简单的两人讨价还价。提议者向回应者提供如何分配一笔钱。回应者决定接受还是拒绝该提议。当回应者接受时,每个参与者根据提议者的提议获得金钱。如果提议被拒绝,双方都得不到任何东西。在最后通牒博弈中拒绝“白得的”钱代表偏离了标准的理性经济模型。这种行为可能与对不公平提议的不良心理反应有关,包括愤怒、敌意和冲动。目前,人们认为与愤怒和冲动最合理相关的生物系统是血清素能系统。我们假设,通过血小板血清素水平测量的血清素能活性将区分拒绝或接受低最后通牒博弈提议的受试者。对60名经济专业学生(31名男性和29名女性,平均年龄:24.4±2.3岁)的样本进行了调查。正如预测的那样,拒绝不公平提议(10欧元中的1欧元)的参与者的平均血小板血清素水平显著低于接受提议的参与者(分别为2.86±0.13与3.48±0.11 nmol/10⁹血小板,p<0.001)。我们得出结论,低血小板血清素可能作为一种可靠的生物标志物,用于识别在实验神经经济环境中更有可能拒绝不公平最后通牒提议的人。我们的初步数据似乎表明,血清素能系统可能在最后通牒博弈的拒绝行为中发挥重要作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验