Schefold Joerg Christian, Hasper Dietrich, Volk Hans Dieter, Reinke Petra
Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité University Medicine, Campus Virchow Clinic, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany.
Med Hypotheses. 2008 Aug;71(2):203-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2008.03.022. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
Despite numerous advances in intensive care medicine, sepsis remains a deadly disease. Today, conventional therapeutic approaches and mainstream scientific research mostly focus on symptomatic early goal directed organ support therapy. This includes fluid resuscitation, choice and timing of antibiotics and vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, and renal replacement strategies. Furthermore, great effort has been undertaken to investigate whether tightly controlled blood glucose levels, the application of corticosteroids, and early medication using activated protein C improves survival. However, most of these mainstream approaches have recently been shown unsuccessful in large-scale clinical trials. Current data now suggest that besides giving fluids, antibiotics, and symptomatic organ support, little - if at all - can be done to improve mortality from sepsis. This might be due to the fact that in the presence of modern intensive care medicine, most patients with severe sepsis or septic shock will survive the early "shock phase" of the disease. Mounting evidence suggests that in the course of the disease, most septic patients are then subjected to a secondary phase, which is characterised by a failure of cell-mediated immunity. This leads to repeated and uncontrolled infections, "chronic" multiple organ failure, and death in a large number of cases. Here we hypotheses that in order to profoundly influence survival from sepsis, future therapeutic efforts in the field should concentrate on this later "hypo-immune" stage of sepsis, associated immune phenomena, and novel immunomodulatory strategies. This may lead to the development of advanced immunomodulatory therapies available for widespread clinical use. Today, in the era of antibiotics and advanced organ system support therapy, it is not the bug that kills you- survival has become a matter of whether your cellular immune system can cope.
尽管重症监护医学取得了诸多进展,但脓毒症仍然是一种致命疾病。如今,传统治疗方法和主流科学研究大多集中在有症状的早期目标导向性器官支持治疗上。这包括液体复苏、抗生素和血管升压药的选择与使用时机、机械通气以及肾脏替代策略。此外,人们还付出了巨大努力来研究严格控制血糖水平、应用皮质类固醇以及早期使用活化蛋白C进行药物治疗是否能提高生存率。然而,最近在大规模临床试验中,这些主流方法大多被证明并不成功。目前的数据表明,除了给予液体、抗生素和对症的器官支持外,几乎无法采取其他措施来降低脓毒症的死亡率。这可能是因为在现代重症监护医学的支持下,大多数严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者能够挺过疾病的早期“休克阶段”。越来越多的证据表明,在疾病过程中,大多数脓毒症患者随后会进入第二阶段,其特征是细胞介导的免疫功能衰竭。这会导致反复且无法控制的感染、“慢性”多器官功能衰竭,并在大量病例中导致死亡。在此,我们提出假设,为了深刻影响脓毒症患者的生存率,该领域未来的治疗努力应集中在脓毒症后期的“免疫低下”阶段、相关的免疫现象以及新型免疫调节策略上。这可能会促成可广泛应用于临床的先进免疫调节疗法的开发。在当今抗生素和先进器官系统支持治疗的时代,致人死亡的并非病菌——生存已成为你的细胞免疫系统能否应对的问题。