Williamson L
School of Law, University of Glasgow, 8 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
J Med Ethics. 2008 May;34(5):357-60. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.021634.
Bioethicists have recently expressed concern over a lack of quality control within the field. This apprehension focuses on bioethics expanding in ways that obscure its distinctive ethical remit and the specialist reasoning skills it requires. This thesis about the quality and conduct of bioethics may have particular relevance for clinical ethics. As one of the youngest offshoots of bioethics, the field focuses on the ethical issues that arise specifically in a clinical context. However, non-ethics specialists are increasingly involved in this field. This means that clinical ethics could be especially vulnerable to the quality control concerns articulated within bioethics. The growing public profile of clinical ethics means that concerns over quality in this area warrant specific attention by those concerned with declining standards in bioethics and those working in clinical ethics.
生物伦理学家最近对该领域缺乏质量控制表示担忧。这种担忧集中在生物伦理学以模糊其独特的伦理职责和所需专业推理技能的方式不断扩展。关于生物伦理学的质量和行为的这一论点可能与临床伦理学特别相关。作为生物伦理学最年轻的分支之一,该领域专注于在临床环境中特别出现的伦理问题。然而,非伦理学专家越来越多地参与到这个领域。这意味着临床伦理学可能特别容易受到生物伦理学中所阐述的质量控制问题的影响。临床伦理学日益提高的公众关注度意味着,那些关注生物伦理学标准下降的人和从事临床伦理学工作的人应特别关注该领域的质量问题。