Kinkingnéhun S, Sarazin M, Lehéricy S, Guichart-Gomez E, Hergueta T, Dubois B
INSERM U610, Paris, France.
Neurology. 2008 Jun 3;70(23):2201-11. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000303960.01039.43. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
To determine whether regional atrophy or neuropsychological factors can predict the rate of decline in patients with mild Alzheimer disease (AD).
Despite important implications for planning the care and treatment strategy, few prognostic factors of severe AD progression are known.
Twenty-three patients with mild AD were followed up every 6 months over the course of 3 years. At baseline, patients with AD and 18 controls underwent a neuropsychological battery and a brain MRI. At the end of the 3 years, patients with AD were dichotomized into slow decliners (SLD) or fast decliners (FD) groups on the basis of their decline in Mini-Mental State Examination score over time. We compared baseline cognitive performance and imaging data using voxel-based morphometry (VBM).
SLD and FD groups did not differ in age, gender, level of education, mean estimated duration of illness, and standard neuropsychological data at inclusion, except for the Attentional Battery of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Tests Automated Battery (speed processing in shifting condition). VBM comparison between SLD and FD groups demonstrated more gray matter tissue loss in the FD group in the medial occipitoparietal areas, especially in the precuneus, the lingual gyrus, the cuneus, and the surrounding cortex of the parieto-occipital sulcus bilaterally.
Voxel-based morphometry analysis demonstrated that patients who will have a faster decline at 3 years already had a more extensive cortical atrophy than SLD patients, especially in the medial occipitoparietal areas, which was not yet detected by clinical and neuropsychological assessment.
确定区域萎缩或神经心理学因素是否能够预测轻度阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的衰退速率。
尽管对于规划护理和治疗策略具有重要意义,但严重AD进展的预后因素却鲜为人知。
23例轻度AD患者在3年期间每6个月接受一次随访。在基线时,AD患者和18名对照者接受了一套神经心理学测试和脑部MRI检查。在3年结束时,根据AD患者简易精神状态检查表评分随时间的下降情况,将其分为衰退缓慢组(SLD)或衰退快速组(FD)。我们使用基于体素的形态学测量法(VBM)比较了基线认知表现和影像数据。
SLD组和FD组在年龄、性别、教育水平、平均估计病程以及纳入时的标准神经心理学数据方面并无差异,但剑桥神经心理学测试自动成套测验的注意力成套测验(转移条件下的速度处理)除外。SLD组和FD组之间的VBM比较显示,FD组在内侧枕顶叶区域,尤其是双侧楔前叶、舌回、楔叶以及枕顶沟周围皮质的灰质组织损失更多。
基于体素的形态学测量分析表明,在3年时衰退更快的患者已经比SLD患者有更广泛的皮质萎缩,尤其是在内侧枕顶叶区域,而这在临床和神经心理学评估中尚未被检测到。