Suppr超能文献

基于体素的形态测量法与海马体积测量法在阿尔茨海默病中的准确性比较。

A comparison between the accuracy of voxel-based morphometry and hippocampal volumetry in Alzheimer's disease.

作者信息

Testa Cristina, Laakso Mikko P, Sabattoli Francesca, Rossi Roberta, Beltramello Alberto, Soininen Hilkka, Frisoni Giovanni B

机构信息

Laboratory of Epidemiology and Neuroimaging, IRCCS San Giovanni di Dio - FBF, Brescia, Italy.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Mar;19(3):274-82. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20001.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the accuracy of voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and region of interest (ROI)-based hippocampal volumetry to detect medial temporal lobe atrophy in Alzheimer's disease (AD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 27 AD patients (age 74 +/- 9 years; 22 women; Mini-Mental State Exam [MMSE] 21 +/- 4) and 25 controls (age 70 +/- 8; 16 women; MMSE 29 +/- 1) were studied. Accuracy of VBM to detect gray matter loss in those seven AD patients and 11 controls with similar ROI-based hippocampal measures and of ROI-based volumetry to detect gray matter loss in those four AD patients and five controls with similar VBM-based hippocampal measures was assessed. VBM was performed with statistical parametric mapping (SPM99).

RESULTS

The area under the curve was 0.96 (95% C.I., 0.92-1.00) for VBM, 0.89 (95% C.I., 0.80-0.98) for ROI-based hippocampal measures, and 0.99 (95% C.I., 0.96-1.00) for both. In subjects with similar ROI-based hippocampal measures, VBM detected atrophy in AD patients at P < 0.0001, while in subjects with similar VBM-based hippocampal measure, volumetry was not significant (P = 0.11). Both measures independently contributed to discrimination (P = 0.004 and P = 0.032) in a logistic regression model.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that VBM is more accurate, but the combination of both methods provides the highest accuracy for detection of hippocampal atrophy in AD.

摘要

目的

比较基于体素的形态测量法(VBM)和基于感兴趣区域(ROI)的海马体积测量法在检测阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者内侧颞叶萎缩方面的准确性。

材料与方法

共研究了27例AD患者(年龄74±9岁;22名女性;简易精神状态检查表[MMSE]评分为21±4)和25名对照者(年龄70±8岁;16名女性;MMSE评分为29±1)。评估了VBM在7例AD患者和11例对照者中检测灰质丢失的准确性,这些患者和对照者具有相似的基于ROI的海马测量值;同时评估了基于ROI的体积测量法在4例AD患者和5例对照者中检测灰质丢失的准确性,这些患者和对照者具有相似的基于VBM的海马测量值。使用统计参数映射(SPM99)进行VBM。

结果

VBM的曲线下面积为0.96(95%可信区间,0.92 - 1.00),基于ROI的海马测量法的曲线下面积为0.89(95%可信区间,0.80 - 0.98),两者联合的曲线下面积为0.99(95%可信区间,0.96 - 1.00)。在具有相似基于ROI的海马测量值的受试者中,VBM在P < 0.0001时检测到AD患者存在萎缩;而在具有相似基于VBM的海马测量值的受试者中,体积测量法无显著差异(P = 0.11)。在逻辑回归模型中,两种测量方法均对鉴别有独立贡献(P = 0.004和P = 0.032)。

结论

这些结果表明VBM更准确,但两种方法联合使用在检测AD患者海马萎缩方面具有最高的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验