Marković Olivera, Marisavljević D, Cemerikić V, Vidović A, Perunicić M, Todorović M, Elezović I, Colović M
Medical Training Center, KBC "Bezanijska kosa", Auto put bb, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia.
Med Oncol. 2008;25(4):451-7. doi: 10.1007/s12032-008-9066-y. Epub 2008 May 1.
The conflicting data are reported on the clinical significance of VEGF deregulation and intensity of angiogenesis in multiple myeloma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and prognostic significance of VEGF expression and microvessel density (MVD) in multiple myeloma, as well as the relationship of their expression with selected clinical data, histological features, and proliferative activity of myeloma cells. We analyzed bone marrow biopsy specimens obtained from 59 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Expression of VEGF and MVD was analyzed using standard immunohistochemical method (antibodies against VEGF and CD34, respectively) on B5-fixed and routinely processed paraffin-embedded bone marrow specimens. MVD was estimated by counting the number of microvessels in three "hot spots" at 400x magnification. VEGF immunoreactivity was estimated on the basis of intensity and percentage of positive plasma cells. VEGF was expressed in 47/59 (79.7%) specimens. There was no significant correlation between VEGF overexpression and age, clinical stage, the extent of osteolytic lesions, type of monoclonal protein, hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, serum concentration of creatinine, calcium, and albumins, the extent of bone marrow infiltration, histological grade, and proliferative activity index (measured with Ki-67 immunoreactivity). No significant difference was observed regarding the overall survival between VEGF-positive and VEGF-negative patients (29 vs. 34 months, P = 0.8). Median MVD was 15, ranging from 1 to 89 microvessels per three "hot spots". There was significant correlation between MVD and histological grade, the extent of bone marrow infiltration, and proliferative activity. Significant difference was observed regarding the overall survival between patients with low MVD (<15) and patients with high MVD (> or = 15) (46 vs. 22 months, P = 0.009; univariate analysis). The results of this study did not reveal clinical significance of VEGF overexpression in multiple myeloma. On the contrary, the extent of bone marrow angiogenesis is an indicator of biological potency of malignant clone and a predictor of poor survival in newly diagnosed myeloma.
关于血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)失调的临床意义以及多发性骨髓瘤中血管生成强度,有相互矛盾的数据报道。本研究的目的是评估VEGF表达和微血管密度(MVD)在多发性骨髓瘤中的发生率及预后意义,以及它们的表达与选定的临床数据、组织学特征和骨髓瘤细胞增殖活性之间的关系。我们分析了从59例新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤患者获取的骨髓活检标本。使用标准免疫组织化学方法(分别针对VEGF和CD34的抗体),在经B5固定并常规处理的石蜡包埋骨髓标本上分析VEGF表达和MVD。通过在400倍放大倍数下计数三个“热点”中的微血管数量来估计MVD。基于阳性浆细胞的强度和百分比来估计VEGF免疫反应性。47/59(79.7%)的标本中表达VEGF。VEGF过表达与年龄、临床分期、溶骨性病变范围、单克隆蛋白类型、血红蛋白浓度、血小板计数、血清肌酐、钙和白蛋白浓度、骨髓浸润程度、组织学分级以及增殖活性指数(用Ki-67免疫反应性测量)之间无显著相关性。VEGF阳性和VEGF阴性患者的总生存期无显著差异(29个月对34个月,P = 0.8)。MVD中位数为15,每三个“热点”中微血管数量范围为1至89个。MVD与组织学分级、骨髓浸润程度和增殖活性之间存在显著相关性。低MVD(<15)患者和高MVD(>或 = 15)患者的总生存期存在显著差异(46个月对22个月,P = 0.009;单因素分析)。本研究结果未揭示VEGF过表达在多发性骨髓瘤中的临床意义。相反,骨髓血管生成程度是恶性克隆生物学潜能的指标,也是新诊断骨髓瘤患者生存不良的预测因素。