Lee Eung-Seok, Issa Jean-Pierre, Roberts Dianna B, Williams Michelle D, Weber Randal S, Kies Merrill S, El-Naggar Adel K
Department of Pathology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 May 1;14(9):2664-72. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1232.
To compare the methylation status of tumor-associated genes by quantitative pyrosequencing and qualitative methylation-specific PCR (MSP) techniques and to correlate the results with clinicopathologic features and patients outcome to determine which method might have greater clinical utility.
The hypermethylation status of the retinoid acid receptor beta2 (RARbeta2), RAS association domain family 1A (RASSF1A), O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), and E-cadherin genes was analyzed in five salivary carcinoma cell lines and 69 human salivary gland carcinoma specimens by pyrosequencing and MSP techniques. The two datasets were compared by linear regression. Correlations between methods and with clinicopathologic characteristics were assessed by Pearson's chi(2) test or the two-tailed Fisher exact test, as applicable, using cutoff points determined from the regression curves and empirical fitting. We also investigated the effect of demethylating agents on methylated genes in cell lines to assess their effect on the expression of these genes.
Overall, regression analysis indicated high degrees of correlation of the two methods for measurement of methylation for the RARb2, RASSF1A, and MGMT genes (adjusted R(2) = 0.319, 0.835, and 0.178; P < 0.001, <0.001, and 0.0002, respectively) among the 69 tumors tested. However, the pyrosequencing technique yielded four more instances of methylation above background levels than MSP for RARbeta2 and three more for RASSF1. Methylation of either RARbeta2 and RASSF1A alone or both by pyrosequencing were correlated with tumor type (P = 0.027, 0.014, and 0.012, respectively). Methylation of RARbeta2 alone and in combination with RASSF1A by pyrosequencing were also significantly correlated with tumor grade (P = 0.014 and 0.011, respectively) and 3-year survival (P = 0.002 and 0.004, respectively). The survival curves of patients who had hypermethylation at both RARbeta2 and RASSF1A were significantly lower than those of patients who had hypermethylation at neither or just for the RASSF1A (P = 0.008 and 0.007, respectively). 5-Azadeoxycytidine treatment of methylated cell lines led to the reactivation of RARbeta2 expression in only one of the five cell lines.
(a) Although the methylation status of RARb2, RASSF1A, and MGMT genes by both techniques were significantly correlated, pyrosequencing is generally more sensitive and its results correlate better with the clinical variables than those of MSP. (b) The methylation level of the RARbeta2 and/or RASSF1A by pyrosequencing is significantly associated with aggressive tumor phenotypes and patients survival.
通过定量焦磷酸测序和定性甲基化特异性PCR(MSP)技术比较肿瘤相关基因的甲基化状态,并将结果与临床病理特征及患者预后相关联,以确定哪种方法可能具有更大的临床实用性。
采用焦磷酸测序和MSP技术分析了5种涎腺癌细胞系和69例人涎腺癌标本中维甲酸受体β2(RARβ2)、RAS关联结构域家族1A(RASSF1A)、O(6)-甲基鸟嘌呤-DNA甲基转移酶(MGMT)和E-钙黏蛋白基因的高甲基化状态。通过线性回归比较两个数据集。根据回归曲线和经验拟合确定的截断点,采用Pearson卡方检验或双侧Fisher精确检验(如适用)评估方法之间以及与临床病理特征的相关性。我们还研究了去甲基化剂对细胞系中甲基化基因的影响,以评估其对这些基因表达的作用。
总体而言,回归分析表明,在69例检测的肿瘤中,两种方法检测RARb2、RASSF1A和MGMT基因甲基化的相关性较高(调整后R²分别为0.319、0.835和0.178;P分别<0.001、<0.001和0.0002)。然而,对于RARβ2,焦磷酸测序技术检测到的甲基化高于背景水平的情况比MSP多4例,对于RASSF1多3例。单独或通过焦磷酸测序同时检测到RARβ2和RASSF1A甲基化与肿瘤类型相关(P分别为0.027、0.014和0.012)。通过焦磷酸测序单独检测到RARβ2甲基化以及与RASSF1A联合甲基化也与肿瘤分级(P分别为0.014和0.011)和3年生存率(P分别为0.002和0.004)显著相关。RARβ2和RASSF1A均发生高甲基化的患者的生存曲线显著低于两者均未发生高甲基化或仅RASSF1A发生高甲基化的患者(P分别为0.008和0.007)。用5-氮杂脱氧胞苷处理甲基化细胞系仅导致5个细胞系中的1个细胞系RARβ2表达重新激活。
(a)尽管两种技术检测RARb2、RASSF1A和MGMT基因的甲基化状态显著相关,但焦磷酸测序通常更敏感,其结果与临床变量的相关性比MSP更好。(b)通过焦磷酸测序检测到的RARβ2和/或RASSF1A的甲基化水平与侵袭性肿瘤表型和患者生存率显著相关。