Yamashiro T, Homma M, Kohda Y
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2008 Jun;33(3):273-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00917.x.
We assessed the hypnotic effects of and patient satisfaction with three types of hypnotics prescribed empirically: ultra-short-acting (US-a), short-acting (S-a), and intermediate- and long-acting (IL-a) agents.
We studied 310 insomniac patients (age 60.5 +/- 15.0 years) treated with US-a (n = 124), S-a (n = 149) or IL-a (n = 37) agents. Patients were interviewed to evaluate individual satisfaction and drug efficacy. Efficacy, as assessed by total sleep time (TST) and sleep latency time (SLT), was compared between satisfied and dissatisfied patient groups. Nocturnal awaking curve for each hypnotic was used for comparing the effects between satisfied and dissatisfied patient groups in each type of hypnotics.
Thirty-two patients (25.8%) were dissatisfied with US-a, 35 (23.5%) with S-a and 11 (29.7%) with IL-a. TST differed significantly between satisfied and dissatisfied groups: 424 +/- 88 vs. 345 +/- 101 min for US-a (P < 0.001), 440 +/- 84 vs. 359 +/- 111 min for S-a (P < 0.001) and 453 +/- 96 vs. 345 +/- 125 min for IL-a (P < 0.01), respectively. With IL-a agents, the SLT of dissatisfied patients was longer than in satisfied ones (81 +/- 52 vs. 33 +/- 22 min, P < 0.05). Twenty (62.5%) dissatisfied patients taking US-a agents awoke before 05:00 hours - a rate significantly higher than satisfied patients (n = 23, 25.0%, P < 0.001). These characteristics of dissatisfied patients were reflected by the patterns of nocturnal awaking curves, although the patterns for satisfied patients were similar among the three types of hypnotics.
Between 24% and 30% of patients were dissatisfied with their hypnotics. Shorter TST was common in dissatisfied patients receiving any agent, for reasons differing among hypnotics (longer SLT with IL-a agents and early awakening with US-a). Drug efficacy and patient satisfaction in empirical use of hypnotics can be assessed by nocturnal awaking curves for each hypnotic.
我们评估了经验性开具的三种催眠药物的催眠效果及患者满意度,这三种药物分别为超短效(US-a)、短效(S-a)以及中长效(IL-a)制剂。
我们研究了310名失眠患者(年龄60.5±15.0岁),他们分别接受US-a(n = 124)、S-a(n = 149)或IL-a(n = 37)制剂治疗。对患者进行访谈以评估个体满意度和药物疗效。通过总睡眠时间(TST)和睡眠潜伏期(SLT)评估疗效,并在满意和不满意的患者组之间进行比较。每种催眠药物的夜间觉醒曲线用于比较每种催眠药物中满意和不满意患者组之间的效果。
32名患者(25.8%)对US-a不满意,35名(23.5%)对S-a不满意,11名(29.7%)对IL-a不满意。满意和不满意组之间的TST有显著差异:US-a分别为424±88分钟和345±101分钟(P < 0.001),S-a分别为440±84分钟和359±111分钟(P < 0.001),IL-a分别为453±96分钟和345±125分钟(P < 0.01)。使用IL-a制剂时,不满意患者的SLT比满意患者长(81±52分钟对33±22分钟,P < 0.05)。20名(62.5%)服用US-a制剂的不满意患者在05:00之前醒来,这一比例显著高于满意患者(n = 23,25.0%,P < 0.001)。不满意患者的这些特征通过夜间觉醒曲线的模式得以体现,尽管满意患者在三种催眠药物中的模式相似。
24%至30%的患者对其催眠药物不满意。接受任何一种制剂的不满意患者中,较短的TST较为常见,原因因催眠药物而异(IL-a制剂的SLT较长,US-a制剂会早醒)。每种催眠药物的夜间觉醒曲线可用于评估经验性使用催眠药物时的药物疗效和患者满意度。