• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾移植中的早期移植肾功能:腹腔镜供肾切除术与开放供肾切除术的比较。

Early graft function in kidney transplantation: comparison between laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and open donor nephrectomy.

作者信息

Percegona L S, Bignelli A T, Adamy A, Machado C, Pilz F, Meyer F, Hokazono S R, Riella M C

机构信息

Transplant Unit Hospital Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Curitiba, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2008 Apr;40(3):685-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.03.006.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.03.006
PMID:18454986
Abstract

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LN) offers less postoperative pain and early recovery in living kidney donors, but graft kidney function in the recipients can be delayed due to prolonged warm ischemic time (WIT) and adverse effects of pneumoperitoneum. We compared the early function of the grafted kidney and the complications in kidney recipients after LN versus open nephrectomy (ON). We analyzed 109 kidney recipients from living donors, including 60 LN and 49 ON, comparing immediate diuresis after surgery, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by MDRD formula (modification of diet in renal disease) at day 5, and complications. The recipient age among the LN group was 20 to 73 years with 51% men among whom 95% of patients had immediate diuresis with GFR at day 5 varying from 4.85 to 99.45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) by MDRD Surgical complications were renal artery stenosis (5%) and urinary leakage (5%). The recipient among age ON cases varied from 18 to 63 years with 63% men and immediate diuresis observed in 87% and GFR at day 5 varied from 4.75 to 101.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2) by MDRD. Renal artery stenosis was observed in 8.16%. The WIT was longer (P < .05) among the LN (1.4 to 11 minutes) compared with the ON group (1 to 4 minutes). GFR at day 5 showed no difference between the two groups. In conclusion, WIT was higher among LN compared with ON but did not seem to influence early function of the grafted kidney.

摘要

腹腔镜供肾切除术(LN)可减少活体肾供者术后疼痛并使其更早康复,但受者的移植肾功能可能因热缺血时间(WIT)延长和气腹的不良影响而延迟。我们比较了LN与开放肾切除术(ON)后移植肾的早期功能及肾受者的并发症。我们分析了109例活体供肾的肾受者,其中60例行LN,49例行ON,比较了术后即刻利尿情况、术后第5天根据肾病饮食改良公式(MDRD)计算的肾小球滤过率(GFR)以及并发症。LN组受者年龄为20至73岁,男性占51%,其中95%的患者术后即刻利尿,术后第5天MDRD计算的GFR为4.85至99.45 mL/min/1.73 m²。手术并发症为肾动脉狭窄(5%)和尿漏(5%)。ON组受者年龄为18至63岁,男性占63%,87%的患者术后即刻利尿,术后第5天MDRD计算的GFR为4.75至101.1 mL/min/1.73 m²。肾动脉狭窄发生率为8.16%。与ON组(1至4分钟)相比,LN组的WIT更长(P < 0.05)(1.4至11分钟)。两组术后第5天的GFR无差异。总之,与ON相比,LN的WIT更高,但似乎并未影响移植肾的早期功能。

相似文献

1
Early graft function in kidney transplantation: comparison between laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and open donor nephrectomy.肾移植中的早期移植肾功能:腹腔镜供肾切除术与开放供肾切除术的比较。
Transplant Proc. 2008 Apr;40(3):685-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.03.006.
2
Outcome of renal transplantation with multiple versus single renal arteries after laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a comparative study.腹腔镜活体供肾肾切除术后多支与单支肾动脉肾移植的结果:一项比较研究。
Urology. 2007 May;69(5):824-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.026.
3
Older living donors provide excellent quality kidneys: a single center experience (older living donors).老年活体供者提供优质肾脏:单中心经验(老年活体供者)
Clin Transplant. 2005 Oct;19(5):600-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2004.00328.x.
4
Hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy versus open surgery: evaluation of surgical trauma and late graft function in 82 patients.手辅助腹腔镜活体供肾肾切除术与开放手术对比:82例患者手术创伤及移植肾远期功能评估
Transplant Proc. 2009 Dec;41(10):4039-43. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.08.056.
5
Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the pediatric recipient in a dual-site program.腹腔镜活体供肾切除术:双中心项目中的儿科受者
Pediatr Transplant. 2007 Jun;11(4):429-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2006.00664.x.
6
Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared with open donor nephrectomy.与开放性供体肾切除术相比,腹腔镜活体供体肾切除术在早期和晚期肾功能方面具有相当的结果。
Urology. 2005 May;65(5):862-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.11.051.
7
[The living kidney donor: laparoscopy versus open surgery].[活体肾供体:腹腔镜手术与开放手术]
Nefrologia. 2005;25 Suppl 2:62-6.
8
Early experience of a living donor kidney transplant program.
Eur Urol. 2006 Sep;50(3):542-7; discussion 547-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.03.033. Epub 2006 Mar 31.
9
Robot-assisted laparoscopic and open live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison of donor morbidity and early renal allograft outcomes.机器人辅助腹腔镜与开放活体供肾肾切除术:供体并发症及早期肾移植结果的比较
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Feb;21(2):472-7. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfi150. Epub 2005 Oct 4.
10
Influence of preoperative allograft function (effective renal plasma flow) on the short-term outcome following living donor kidney transplantation.术前同种异体移植肾功能(有效肾血浆流量)对活体供肾移植短期预后的影响。
Transplant Proc. 2008 Sep;40(7):2108-11. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.07.048.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood Transfusions in Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: Single Center Experience from 500 Cases.腹腔镜活体供肾肾切除术的输血情况:来自500例病例的单中心经验
Res Rep Urol. 2020 Jan 15;12:1-5. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S229431. eCollection 2020.
2
Robotic-assistance does not enhance standard laparoscopic technique for right-sided donor nephrectomy.机器人辅助并不能提高右侧供体肾切除术的标准腹腔镜技术。
JSLS. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):202-7. doi: 10.4293/108680812x13427982376068.
3
Multiple renal arteries challenge in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: how far can we go?
腹腔镜供肾切除术治疗多条肾动脉的挑战:我们能走多远?
J Korean Surg Soc. 2011 Apr;80(4):272-7. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2011.80.4.272. Epub 2011 Apr 12.