Phillips Ceri, Main Chris, Buck Rhiannon, Aylward Mansel, Wynne-Jones Gwenllian, Farr Angela
Institute for Health Research, School of Health Science, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP Wales, UK.
Health Policy. 2008 Dec;88(2-3):166-75. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.008. Epub 2008 May 1.
This review aims to bring together current evidence on the impact of chronic pain in terms of its economic costs, cost to healthcare services and benefit agencies, and quality of life, and to discuss the implications of this for government policies. Quantifying the burden and cost of pain is challenging due to its multi-factorial nature and wide reaching effects. Nonetheless, there is a consensus that chronic pain has a significant impact on levels of resources across society and on quality of life. Pain is a complex bio-psychosocial experience and chronic pain is a consequence, in part, of adopting a narrow biomedical treatment approach to a problem which requires a multi-disciplinary approach to address the psychosocial, behavioural and biomedical aspects of pain. Although effective pain management interventions and programmes exist, provision of these services is inconsistent, and chronic pain is not given the priority it requires in view of the extent of its burden on individuals and society. Current relevant government policies in U.K. are discussed to highlight the need to prioritise pain and adopt a whole-systems approach to its management if governments are to successfully reduce its cost and burden.
本综述旨在汇总目前有关慢性疼痛在经济成本、对医疗服务和福利机构的成本以及生活质量方面影响的证据,并讨论其对政府政策的影响。由于疼痛具有多因素性质和广泛影响,量化疼痛的负担和成本具有挑战性。尽管如此,人们一致认为慢性疼痛对整个社会的资源水平和生活质量有重大影响。疼痛是一种复杂的生物心理社会体验,而慢性疼痛部分是由于对一个需要多学科方法来解决疼痛的心理社会、行为和生物医学方面问题采用了狭隘的生物医学治疗方法所致。虽然存在有效的疼痛管理干预措施和方案,但这些服务的提供并不一致,而且鉴于慢性疼痛对个人和社会的负担程度,它并未得到应有的重视。文中讨论了英国当前的相关政府政策,以强调如果政府要成功降低慢性疼痛的成本和负担,就需要将疼痛列为优先事项并采用全系统方法进行管理。