Dogru Hacer, Basaran Sibel, Sarpel Tunay
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, 01330 Adana, Turkey.
Joint Bone Spine. 2008 Jul;75(4):445-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.07.016. Epub 2008 May 2.
There is a lack of evidence about the effectiveness of therapeutic ultrasound (US) compared with placebo US in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis. This study was performed to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic US in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis.
Forty-nine patients with adhesive capsulitis were randomized to US (n=25) and sham US (n=24) groups. Superficial heat and an exercise program were given to both groups. Ultrasound was applied to US group and imitative ultrasound was applied to sham US group for 2 weeks. Shoulder range of motion (ROM), pain and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) were assessed at the beginning, after treatment and after 3 months (control). Short Form-36 (SF-36) was applied for assessing general health status at the beginning and after 3 months. Compliance with the home exercise program was recorded daily on a chart for 3 months.
Shoulder ROM, pain with motion, two subscales and total score of SPADI and physical component summary score of SF-36 were improved significantly in both groups after the treatment and after 3 months (p<0.0001). Improvements in flexion, inner and outer rotation values were significantly higher in the US group when we compared the differences between post- and pre-treatment values of shoulder ROM. The differences between control and pre-treatment values of inner and outer rotation were also significantly higher in the US group (p=0.002 and p=0.02 respectively). No significant difference was detected in pain, SPADI and SF-36 scores between groups. The exercise compliance was significantly higher in the sham US group (p=0.04).
Our results suggest that US compared with sham US gives no relevant benefit in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis. Effectiveness of US might be masked by worse pre-treatment values of the US group and higher exercise compliance of the sham US group.
与安慰剂超声相比,关于治疗性超声(US)治疗粘连性囊炎有效性的证据不足。本研究旨在评估治疗性超声治疗粘连性囊炎的有效性。
49例粘连性囊炎患者被随机分为超声治疗组(n = 25)和假超声治疗组(n = 24)。两组均给予浅表热疗和运动方案。超声治疗组接受超声治疗,假超声治疗组接受模拟超声治疗,为期2周。在治疗开始时、治疗后及3个月(对照)后评估肩部活动范围(ROM)、疼痛及肩痛和功能障碍指数(SPADI)。在治疗开始时及3个月后应用简短健康调查问卷(SF - 36)评估总体健康状况。在3个月内每天在图表上记录家庭运动方案的依从性。
治疗后及3个月后,两组的肩部ROM、运动时疼痛、SPADI的两个子量表及总分以及SF - 36的身体成分汇总得分均有显著改善(p < 0.0001)。当比较肩部ROM治疗前后值的差异时,超声治疗组的屈曲、内旋和外旋值的改善明显更高。超声治疗组内旋和外旋的对照值与治疗前值之间的差异也明显更高(分别为p = 0.002和p = 0.02)。两组之间在疼痛、SPADI和SF - 36评分方面未检测到显著差异。假超声治疗组的运动依从性明显更高(p = 0.04)。
我们的结果表明,与假超声相比,超声在治疗粘连性囊炎方面没有相关益处。超声治疗组较差的治疗前值和假超声治疗组较高的运动依从性可能掩盖了超声的有效性。