Elhafez Haytham M, Elhafez Salam M
Professor of Physical Therapy, Basic Sciences Department, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Professor of Biomechanics and Head of Biomechanics Department, Department of Biomechanics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 Jun;39(5):330-338. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 May 7.
The purpose of this study was to compare axillary ultrasound, laser, and postisometric facilitation technique with standard care in the management of shoulder adhesive capsulitis.
This is a randomized clinical trial study. Fifty-nine participants with shoulder adhesive capsulitis were selected and randomly assigned for eligibility. Forty-five participants were assigned into 3 equal groups of 15, and 14 participants were excluded from the study. The participants were blinded to their group allocation. Standard care group (A) received traditional physical therapy treatment in the form of pulsed ultrasound, scanning laser, supervised exercise program, and home exercise program; group B received the same physical therapy program as group A, except that the ultrasound and scanning laser were applied to the axillary region of the painful shoulder; and group C received the same modified physical therapy program as group B plus postisometric facilitation technique to the painful shoulder. All dependent variables were measured by the second author, who was blinded to the participant's intervention group. The first author administered treatment to all 3 groups. All participants received 12 sessions (3 times/wk for 4 weeks). Pain level and shoulder range of motion (ROM; flexion, abduction, and external rotation) were recorded 3 times (pretreatment, immediately posttreatment, and 4 weeks of treatment).
Mixed-design multivariate analysis of variance indicated significant pain reduction with significant ROM increase in all groups posttreatment and after 4 weeks. Post hoc analysis for within groups revealed that shoulder ROM and pain levels improved significantly posttreatment compared with pretreatment ROM in all groups, with the greatest improvement in group C. Between-group analysis revealed that pain-free shoulder flexion, abduction, external rotation, and pain level improved significantly in group C compared with groups A and B immediately after treatment and after 4 weeks of follow-up (P < .05). Improvements reported in group B is more than in group A, and C is more than in groups A and B.
Combining axillary ultrasound and laser with postisometric facilitation had a greater effect in reducing pain and improving shoulder ROM in patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis compared with axillary ultrasound and laser with traditional exercise.
本研究旨在比较腋窝超声、激光及等长收缩后促进技术与标准护理措施在肩周炎治疗中的效果。
这是一项随机临床试验研究。选取59例肩周炎患者,随机分配以确定入选资格。45例患者被平均分为3组,每组15例,14例患者被排除在研究之外。患者对分组情况不知情。标准护理组(A组)接受传统物理治疗,包括脉冲超声、扫描激光、监督下的运动计划及家庭运动计划;B组接受与A组相同的物理治疗方案,但超声和扫描激光应用于患侧肩部的腋窝区域;C组接受与B组相同的改良物理治疗方案,并对患侧肩部采用等长收缩后促进技术。所有因变量均由第二作者测量,其对患者所在干预组不知情。第一作者对所有3组进行治疗。所有参与者均接受12次治疗(每周3次,共4周)。在治疗前、治疗后即刻及治疗4周时记录疼痛程度和肩部活动范围(ROM;前屈、外展和外旋)3次。
混合设计的多因素方差分析表明,所有组在治疗后及4周时疼痛均显著减轻,ROM显著增加。组内事后分析显示,与治疗前ROM相比,所有组治疗后肩部ROM和疼痛程度均显著改善,C组改善最为明显。组间分析显示,治疗后即刻及随访4周时,C组无痛肩部前屈、外展、外旋及疼痛程度与A组和B组相比有显著改善(P < .05)。B组的改善情况优于A组,C组的改善情况优于A组和B组。
与腋窝超声、激光联合传统运动相比,腋窝超声、激光联合等长收缩后促进技术在减轻肩周炎患者疼痛及改善肩部ROM方面效果更佳。