Tang Ri Bo, Dong Jian Zeng, Zhang Zhao Qi, Li Zhi An, Liu Xing Peng, Kang Jun Ping, Yu Rong Hui, Long De Yong, Ma Chang Sheng
Department of Cardiology, Beijing An Zhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008 Sep;22(3):199-203. doi: 10.1007/s10840-008-9243-0. Epub 2008 May 6.
Recent advances in multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) have allowed an improved analysis of left atrial (LA) and left atrial appendage (LAA) anatomy prior to catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data regarding the ability of MSCT to identify LA/LAA thrombus are limited. This prospective study compared the efficacy of 64-slice contrast-enhanced computed tomography (64CCT) with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) of the heart in the identification of LA/LAA thrombus.
One-hundred and seventy consecutive patients scheduled for first-time catheter ablation of paroxysmal (n = 120) or persistent (n = 50) AF were enrolled for study. Each patient underwent non-gated 64CCT and TEE of the heart for exclusion of LA/LAA thrombus prior to ablation procedure.
Fourteen cases (8.2%) of LA/LAA thrombi were interpreted by 64CCT (ten false-positive, four true positive), whereas 11 actual thrombi (6.5%) were detected by TEE (seven false-negative by 64CCT) in the same population. Maximal dimension of TEE identified thrombi did not differ between the false-negative by 64CCT group and the true-positive group (17 +/- 6 vs. 18 +/- 5 mm P = 0.677). Results indicated 64CCT sensitivity = 36.4%, specificity = 93.7%, positive predictive value = 28.6%, and negative predictive value = 95.5% in the detection of LA/LAA thrombus. The Kappa value in evaluating the agreement between 64CCT and TEE for detection of LA/LAA thrombus was 0.267.
Compared to gold standard TEE, 64CCT was shown to be less reliable in the detection of LA/LAA thrombus prior to catheter ablation in patients with AF.
多层螺旋计算机断层扫描(MSCT)的最新进展使得在心房颤动(AF)导管消融术前能够更好地分析左心房(LA)和左心耳(LAA)的解剖结构。然而,关于MSCT识别LA/LAA血栓能力的数据有限。这项前瞻性研究比较了64层对比增强计算机断层扫描(64CCT)与经食管超声心动图(TEE)在识别LA/LAA血栓方面的效果。
连续纳入170例计划首次进行阵发性(n = 120)或持续性(n = 50)AF导管消融的患者进行研究。每位患者在消融术前接受非门控心脏64CCT和TEE检查以排除LA/LAA血栓。
64CCT诊断出14例(8.2%)LA/LAA血栓(10例假阳性,4例真阳性),而在同一人群中TEE检测到11例实际血栓(6.5%)(64CCT漏诊7例)。64CCT漏诊组与真阳性组中TEE识别的血栓最大直径无差异(17±6 vs. 18±5 mm,P = 0.677)。结果表明64CCT在检测LA/LAA血栓方面的敏感性 = 36.4%,特异性 = 93.7%,阳性预测值 = 28.6%,阴性预测值 = 95.5%。评估64CCT与TEE在检测LA/LAA血栓方面一致性的Kappa值为0.267。
与金标准TEE相比,64CCT在AF患者导管消融术前检测LA/LAA血栓方面可靠性较低。