Pearson A C, Labovitz A J, Tatineni S, Gomez C R
Department of Internal Medicine, St. Louis University Medical Center, Missouri.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Jan;17(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90705-e.
The diagnostic yield of transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography for identifying a cardiac source of embolism was compared in 79 patients presenting with unexplained stroke or transient ischemic attack. There were 35 men and 44 women with a mean age of 59 years (range 17 to 84); 52% had clinical cardiac disease. Both transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiograms were performed using Doppler color flow and contrast imaging. Transesophageal echocardiography identified a potential cardiac source of embolism in 57% of the overall study group compared with only 15% by transthoracic echocardiography (p less than 0.0005). Compared with transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography more frequently identified atrial septal aneurysm associated with a patent foramen ovale (9 versus 1 of 79 patients, p less than 0.005), left atrial thrombus or tumor (6 versus 0 of 79 patients, p less than 0.05) and left atrial spontaneous contrast (13 versus 0 of 79 patients, p less than 0.0005). All cases of left atrial thrombus or spontaneous contrast were identified in patients with clinically identified cardiac disease. In the 38 patients with no cardiac disease, transesophageal echocardiography identified isolated atrial septal aneurysm and atrial septal aneurysm with a patent foramen ovale more frequently than transthoracic echocardiography (8 versus 2 of 38 patients, p less than 0.05). The two techniques had a similar rate of identifying apical thrombus and mitral valve prolapse. Overall, transesophageal echocardiography identified abnormalities in 39% of patients with no cardiac disease versus 19% for transthoracic echocardiography (p less than 0.005). Thus, transesophageal echocardiography identifies potential cardiac sources of embolism in the majority of patients presenting with unexplained stroke.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在79例原因不明的中风或短暂性脑缺血发作患者中,比较了经食管超声心动图和经胸超声心动图对确定心脏栓塞源的诊断率。其中男性35例,女性44例,平均年龄59岁(范围17至84岁);52%有临床心脏病。经胸和经食管超声心动图均使用多普勒彩色血流和造影成像技术。经食管超声心动图在整个研究组中发现57%的患者有潜在心脏栓塞源,而经胸超声心动图仅发现15%(p<0.0005)。与经胸超声心动图相比,经食管超声心动图更常发现与卵圆孔未闭相关的房间隔瘤(79例患者中分别为9例和1例,p<0.005)、左心房血栓或肿瘤(79例患者中分别为6例和0例,p<0.05)以及左心房自发显影(79例患者中分别为13例和0例,p<0.0005)。所有左心房血栓或自发显影病例均在有临床确诊心脏病的患者中发现。在38例无心脏病的患者中,经食管超声心动图比经胸超声心动图更常发现孤立性房间隔瘤和伴有卵圆孔未闭的房间隔瘤(38例患者中分别为8例和2例,p<0.05)。两种技术在识别心尖血栓和二尖瓣脱垂方面的发生率相似。总体而言,经食管超声心动图在39%无心脏病的患者中发现异常,而经胸超声心动图为19%(p<0.005)。因此,经食管超声心动图在大多数原因不明的中风患者中可发现潜在的心脏栓塞源。(摘要截断于250字)