Kurt Beth, Flynn Patricia, Shenep Jerry L, Pounds Stanley, Lensing Shelly, Ribeiro Raul C, Pui Ching-Hon, Razzouk Bassem I, Rubnitz Jeffrey E
Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105-2794, USA.
Cancer. 2008 Jul 15;113(2):376-82. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23563.
The aim of this study was to determine whether antibiotic prophylaxis during periods of neutropenia reduced streptococcal (S. viridans) sepsis and overall bacterial sepsis.
The authors reviewed outcomes of 78 evaluable patients who were consecutively treated for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) from October 2002 through January 2007. Several successive prophylactic antibiotic regimens were used. All patients received antifungal prophylaxis with oral voriconazole.
Oral cephalosporins did not significantly reduce the odds of bacterial sepsis (P = .81) or streptococcal (S. viridans) sepsis (P = .90) relative to no prophylaxis. Intravenous (iv) cefepime completely prevented streptococcal (S. viridans) sepsis and reduced the odds of bacterial sepsis 91% (P < .0001) relative to no prophylaxis, but resistant gram-negative bacteria emerged in 2 patients. Vancomycin with oral ciprofloxacin or a cephalosporin reduced the odds of bacterial sepsis by 93% (P < .0001) and streptococcal (S. viridans) sepsis by 99% (P < .0001). The fungal infection rate did not differ significantly between patients who did and did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis (1.0 per 1000 patient-days for both groups). The observed reduction in average hospital days per chemotherapy course for patients given vancomycin regimens or cefepime was 5.7 (P < .0001) and 4.1 (P = .0039) days, respectively. No reduction was observed with oral cephalosporins (P = .10). Furthermore, vancomycin regimens or cefepime were associated with a 20% reduction in healthcare charges (P = .0015) relative to using no antibiotics. One patient, who was on oral cefuroxime alone, died of septicemia.
Prophylaxis with intravenous cefepime or a vancomycin regimen, and voriconazole, reduced morbidity in children with AML, and resulted in dramatic decreases in the incidence of septicemia and hospitalization days.
本研究的目的是确定中性粒细胞减少期的抗生素预防是否能降低草绿色链球菌败血症及总体细菌败血症的发生率。
作者回顾了2002年10月至2007年1月期间连续接受急性髓系白血病(AML)治疗的78例可评估患者的治疗结果。使用了几种连续的预防性抗生素方案。所有患者均接受口服伏立康唑进行抗真菌预防。
相对于不进行预防,口服头孢菌素并未显著降低细菌败血症(P = 0.81)或草绿色链球菌败血症(P = 0.90)的发生率。与不进行预防相比,静脉注射头孢吡肟完全预防了草绿色链球菌败血症,并使细菌败血症的发生率降低了91%(P < 0.0001),但有2例患者出现了耐革兰阴性菌。万古霉素联合口服环丙沙星或头孢菌素使细菌败血症的发生率降低了93%(P < 0.0001),草绿色链球菌败血症的发生率降低了99%(P < 0.0001)。接受和未接受抗生素预防的患者真菌感染率无显著差异(两组均为每1000患者日1.0例)。接受万古霉素方案或头孢吡肟治疗的患者,每个化疗疗程的平均住院天数分别减少了5.7天(P < 0.0001)和4.1天(P = 0.0039)。口服头孢菌素未观察到住院天数减少(P = 0.10)。此外,与不使用抗生素相比,万古霉素方案或头孢吡肟使医疗费用降低了20%(P = 0.0015)。1例仅接受口服头孢呋辛的患者死于败血症。
静脉注射头孢吡肟或万古霉素方案联合伏立康唑进行预防,可降低AML患儿的发病率,并显著降低败血症的发生率和住院天数。