Crundall David, Cole Geoff G, Underwood Geoffrey
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Apr;70(3):422-30. doi: 10.3758/pp.70.3.422.
When comparing two target elements placed on the same convoluted curve, response times are dependent on the distance between the targets along the curve, despite being separated by a constant Euclidean distance. The present study assessed whether such line tracing is obligatory across the whole of the line even when the task demands do not require it, or whether it is an optional strategy that can be disregarded when the circumstances favor a different method of attentional deployment. Three experiments were conducted to assess whether attention can select only a portion of a curve to trace when it is strategically sensible to do so. The results suggest that attention can indeed jump over portions of a line that are irrelevant to task performance before tracing has begun. However, the final experiment suggests that line tracing may continue beyond the task-relevant portion of the line. We conclude that line tracing is a strategy whose initial deployment can be influenced by top-down factors, rather than an obligatory response triggered by the stimuli-although, once engaged, line tracing may be hard to stop.
当比较放置在同一条盘绕曲线上的两个目标元素时,尽管目标之间的欧几里得距离恒定,但反应时间取决于目标沿曲线的距离。本研究评估了即使任务要求不需要,这种沿曲线追踪是否在整条曲线上都是必须的,或者它是否是一种在情况有利于不同注意力部署方法时可以忽略的可选策略。进行了三项实验,以评估当策略上可行时,注意力是否只能选择曲线的一部分进行追踪。结果表明,在追踪开始之前,注意力确实可以跳过与任务表现无关的线段部分。然而,最后一项实验表明,沿曲线追踪可能会延伸到线段与任务相关部分之外。我们得出结论,沿曲线追踪是一种策略,其初始部署可能受自上而下因素的影响,而不是由刺激触发的必然反应——尽管一旦开始,沿曲线追踪可能很难停止。