Giovannelli Thorayya Said, Cash Thomas F, Henson James M, Engle Erin K
Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA.
Body Image. 2008 Jun;5(2):216-23. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.01.001. Epub 2008 May 6.
Some researchers have argued that evaluative body image may be better assessed by measures that weight dissatisfaction-satisfaction ratings by their subjective importance to individuals. The Body Areas Satisfaction Scale (BASS) is a frequently used, standardized assessment of evaluative body image, albeit one that does not use differential item weights. This investigation, with 410 female and male college students, examined whether an importance-weighted revision of the BASS would have incremental validity relative to the original version in the prediction of multiple criterion variables. Results confirmed the reliability and validity of unweighted and weighted versions. However, the validity of weighted versions did not surpass that of the original BASS. The extremity of individuals' satisfaction and dissatisfaction ratings appears inherently to reflect the importance placed on physical attributes for self-evaluation. Moderated regression analyses offered only weak support for the interaction of average satisfaction and average importance ratings beyond their main effects. The simpler, unweighted BASS is an acceptable assessment of evaluative body image.
一些研究人员认为,通过根据个体主观重要性对不满意-满意评分进行加权的测量方法,可能能更好地评估评价性身体意象。身体部位满意度量表(BASS)是一种常用的、标准化的评价性身体意象评估工具,尽管它没有使用差异项目权重。这项针对410名男女大学生的调查研究,检验了BASS的重要性加权修订版在预测多个标准变量方面相对于原始版本是否具有增量效度。结果证实了未加权版和加权版的信度和效度。然而,加权版的效度并未超过原始BASS。个体满意和不满意评分的极端程度似乎本身就反映了对用于自我评价的身体属性的重视程度。调节回归分析仅为平均满意度和平均重要性评分在其主效应之外的交互作用提供了微弱支持。更简单的、未加权的BASS是评价性身体意象的一种可接受的评估方法。