Schoth F, Kraemer N, Niendorf T, Hohl C, Gunther R W, Krombach G A
Department of Radiology, University Hospital, RWTH-Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52057 Aachen, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2008 Oct;18(10):2258-64. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0972-3. Epub 2008 May 8.
We examined to what degree the visualization of anatomic structures in the human knee is improved using 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and many element RF receive coils as compared to 1.5 T. We imaged 20 knees at 1.5 and 3.0 T using T2-weighted STIR, T2-weighted gradient echo, T1-weighted spin-echo, true-FISP and T2-weighted fast spin echo techniques in conjunction with 32-element RF coil arrays. The 3.0-T examination was considerably faster than its 1.5-T counterpart. A superior subjective visibility at 3.0 T vs 1.5 T was found in 27 of 50 evaluated structures (meniscus, ligaments) with the exception of true-FISP techniques. The 3.0-T examination provided a better visibility (evaluated by blinded consensus-reading by two radiologists) of small structures such as the ligamentum transversum genu. Also, cartilage was better delineated at 3.0 T. A 23% increased average signal-to-noise ratio as assessed using a temporal filter was observed at 3.0 T as compared to 1.5 T. At 3.0 T, imaging of the human knee is faster and results in a subjective visibility of anatomic structures that is superior to and competitive with 1.5 T.
我们研究了与1.5T相比,使用3.0-T磁共振成像(MRI)和多元素射频接收线圈时,人体膝关节解剖结构的可视化程度能在多大程度上得到改善。我们使用32元素射频线圈阵列,结合T2加权短反转恢复序列(STIR)、T2加权梯度回波序列、T1加权自旋回波序列、稳态自由进动序列(true-FISP)和T2加权快速自旋回波序列,对20个膝关节在1.5T和3.0T下进行成像。3.0-T检查比1.5-T检查快得多。除了稳态自由进动序列技术外,在50个评估结构(半月板、韧带)中的27个结构中,发现3.0T时的主观可见性优于1.5T。3.0-T检查对诸如膝横韧带等小结构提供了更好的可见性(由两位放射科医生通过盲法共识阅读评估)。此外,在3.0T时软骨的轮廓更清晰。与1.5T相比,在3.0T时使用时间滤波器评估观察到平均信噪比提高了23%。在3.0T时,人体膝关节成像更快,并且解剖结构的主观可见性优于1.5T且与之相当。