Meek Marcel F, Jansen Koen
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand, and Aesthetic Surgery, Bernhoven Hospital, Veghel, The Netherlands.
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009 Jun;89(3):734-8. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32024.
Long-term nerve guide studies on nerve regeneration in vivo are scarce. Previously, we showed that small fragments of biomaterial could still be found on the edge of the epineurium of the regenerated nerve after implantation of poly(DL-lactide-epsilon-caprolactone) [poly(DLLA-epsilon-CL), Neurolac(R)] nerve guides. As these nerve guides are assumed to fully resorb, we studied the 2-year degradation and possible long-term foreign body reaction against the nerve guides after implantation in the sciatic nerve of the rat. In addition, the distribution of both collagen type III and IV, and nerve regeneration through the nerve guides were studied and compared with the non-operated control side. The results demonstrate that nerve regeneration took place through the poly(DLLA-epsilon-CL) nerve guides. After 2 years of implantation, biomaterial could not be found macroscopically. Biomaterial fragments in company of multi-nucleated giant cells and macrophages were found along the regenerated nerve tissue. Collagen III and IV were both found around the epineurium and perineurium in the regenerated nerve, the organization of these layers resembled that of the contra-lateral non-operated nerve. Although sufficient nerve regeneration was obtained after long-term implantation in the rat sciatic nerve, biomaterial fragments and foreign body reactions against these fragments, even after 24 months of implantation, could still be found. The poly(DLLA-epsilon-CL), Neurolac nerve guides do resorb, however, not complete up to 2 years of implantation. It is not known whether the remaining biomaterial fragments and foreign body reactions may cause granulomas or other complications after longer implantation periods.
关于体内神经再生的长期神经导管研究很少。此前,我们发现,在植入聚(DL-丙交酯-ε-己内酯)[聚(DLLA-ε-CL),Neurolac®]神经导管后,再生神经的神经外膜边缘仍能发现小块生物材料。由于这些神经导管被认为会完全吸收,我们研究了其在大鼠坐骨神经中植入后的2年降解情况以及对神经导管可能的长期异物反应。此外,还研究了III型和IV型胶原蛋白的分布以及通过神经导管的神经再生情况,并与未手术的对照侧进行比较。结果表明,神经再生通过聚(DLLA-ε-CL)神经导管发生。植入2年后,肉眼无法发现生物材料。在再生神经组织周围发现了伴有多核巨细胞和巨噬细胞的生物材料碎片。在再生神经的神经外膜和神经束膜周围均发现了胶原蛋白III和IV,这些层的组织结构与对侧未手术神经相似。尽管在大鼠坐骨神经中长期植入后获得了足够的神经再生,但即使在植入24个月后,仍能发现生物材料碎片以及针对这些碎片的异物反应。聚(DLLA-ε-CL),Neurolac神经导管确实会吸收,然而,在植入2年时并未完全吸收。尚不清楚在更长的植入期后,剩余的生物材料碎片和异物反应是否会导致肉芽肿或其他并发症。