Suppr超能文献

丹麦乳腺癌协作组中的雌激素受体分析。历史、方法、预后及临床意义。

Estrogen Receptor analyses in the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. History, methods, prognosis and clinical implications.

作者信息

Talman Maj-Lis M, Rasmussen Birgitte B, Andersen Jørn, Christensen Ib J

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2008;47(4):789-94. doi: 10.1080/02841860801982741.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Estrogen receptor (ER) is a prognostic and predictive biomarker, which has been known for 40 years. The detection method has developed over the years from different biochemical assays (BCA) to immunohistochemistry (IHC) on paraffin embedded tissue. The aim of the present study is to describe the development in ER analysis in the Danish Breast Cancer cooperative Group (DBCG), in the period of 1977 to 2006, regarding quantity and method of analyses. To compare BCA with IHC, and to report the prognosis for low-risk breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the period of 1991-1993, BCA and IHC were both performed on 2 364 tumours from breast cancer patients in Denmark. Three central laboratories in Copenhagen, Aarhus and Aalborg, respectively, performed BCA, while IHC was done in each of the pathology departments participating in the study. Data on ER status, clinical variables and prognostic factors were obtained from the DBCG database. Prognosis is calculated from the DBCG protocol 89a, regarding recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

We find an increasing frequency of ER positive tumours over time, with correlation to patient age. There is a better RFS and OS for tumours positive in both ER determinations. However, BCA is more sensitive than IHC. We find a significant correlation between positive ER status and other low risk factors, except lymph node status.

DISCUSSION

Immunohistochemistry has several advantages compared with BCA; it is decentralised, only requiring small amounts of tumour tissue, with direct light microscopic interpretation of invasive tumour cells. It is less expensive and more rapid than BCA. Results in this study show the same RFS in both ER determinations. We conclude that IHC in analysing ER is a rapid, reliable and easy method, and we recommend the use of external quality control programme.

摘要

引言

雌激素受体(ER)是一种预后和预测生物标志物,至今已有40年历史。多年来,其检测方法已从不同的生化检测(BCA)发展到石蜡包埋组织的免疫组织化学(IHC)。本研究的目的是描述丹麦乳腺癌协作组(DBCG)在1977年至2006年期间ER分析在分析数量和方法方面的发展。比较BCA和IHC,并报告低风险乳腺癌患者的预后情况。

患者与方法

在1991 - 1993年期间,对丹麦乳腺癌患者的2364个肿瘤同时进行了BCA和IHC检测。哥本哈根、奥胡斯和奥尔堡的三个中心实验室分别进行BCA检测,而IHC检测则在参与研究的每个病理科进行。ER状态、临床变量和预后因素的数据取自DBCG数据库。根据DBCG方案89a计算无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)的预后情况。

结果

我们发现随着时间推移,ER阳性肿瘤的频率增加,且与患者年龄相关。两种ER检测均呈阳性的肿瘤具有更好的RFS和OS。然而,BCA比IHC更敏感。我们发现ER阳性状态与除淋巴结状态外的其他低风险因素之间存在显著相关性。

讨论

与BCA相比,免疫组织化学具有多个优点;它可以分散进行,只需要少量肿瘤组织,可通过直接光学显微镜对浸润性肿瘤细胞进行判读。它比BCA成本更低且速度更快。本研究结果显示两种ER检测的RFS相同。我们得出结论,IHC分析ER是一种快速、可靠且简便的方法,并且我们建议使用外部质量控制程序。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验