Suppr超能文献

白内障手术中表面麻醉与球后Tenon囊下阻滞麻醉的比较:手术情况及患者满意度

Topical anesthesia versus sub-Tenon block for cataract surgery: surgical conditions and patient satisfaction.

作者信息

Rodrigues P A, Vale P J, Cruz L M, Carvalho R P, Ribeiro I M, Martins J L

机构信息

Ophthalmology Department, Pedro Hispano Hospital, Matosinhos - Portugal.

出版信息

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008 May-Jun;18(3):356-60. doi: 10.1177/112067210801800307.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the surgical conditions and complications and patient and surgeon satisfaction in cataract surgery by phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia (TA) versus sub-Tenon block (STB).

METHODS

Prospective randomized comparative blind study, without placebo control. Patient satisfaction evaluated by the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS).

RESULTS

The authors prospectively enrolled 59 patients (61% female) in the study, who were randomized into groups: 26 in the TA group and 33 in the STB. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of age, sex, waiting time for surgery, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) state, eye laterality, cataract density, pupillary dilation, or surgery duration, but patient collaboration was better in the STB group. We found a mean 2.2 mmHg post-anesthetic rise in intraocular pressure in the STB group, with normalization at 24 hours, and no rise in the TA group. Subconjunctival hemorrhage and chemosis were more prevalent in the STB group, and the improvement of visual acuity was similar in both groups. Subjective satisfaction with the anesthetic technique, both for the surgeon and for the patient, was more elevated in the STB group. The final ISAS scores were 1.87 in the TA group and 2.71 in the STB (p<0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The data indicate that more significant anesthesia and analgesia was achieved with the STB, leading to more favorable surgical conditions and enhanced patient and surgeon satisfaction.

摘要

目的

比较表面麻醉(TA)与球后阻滞(STB)下白内障超声乳化手术的手术条件、并发症以及患者和手术医生的满意度。

方法

前瞻性随机对照双盲研究,无安慰剂对照。采用爱荷华麻醉满意度量表(ISAS)评估患者满意度。

结果

作者前瞻性纳入59例患者(61%为女性)进行研究,随机分为两组:TA组26例,STB组33例。两组在年龄、性别、手术等待时间、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、患眼侧别、白内障密度、瞳孔散大情况或手术时长方面无统计学显著差异,但STB组患者配合度更好。我们发现STB组麻醉后眼压平均升高2.2 mmHg,24小时恢复正常,TA组眼压无升高。STB组结膜下出血和结膜水肿更常见,两组视力改善情况相似。STB组手术医生和患者对麻醉技术的主观满意度更高。TA组最终ISAS评分为1.87,STB组为2.71(p<0.0 .005)。

结论

数据表明,STB可实现更有效的麻醉和镇痛,带来更有利的手术条件,并提高患者和手术医生的满意度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验