Orsini L, Corander J, Alasentie A, Hanski I
Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, PO Box 65 (Viikinkaari 1), FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Mol Ecol. 2008 Jun;17(11):2629-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03782.x. Epub 2008 May 5.
The Glanville fritillary butterfly (Melitaea cinxia) has been studied in the Aland Islands in Finland since 1991, where it occurs as a classic metapopulation in a large network of 4000 dry meadows. Much ecological work has been conducted on this species, but population genetic studies have been hampered by paucity of suitable genetic markers. Here, using single nucleotide polymorphisms and microsatellites developed for the Glanville fritillary, we examine the correspondence between the demographic and genetic spatial structures. Given the dynamic nature of the metapopulation, the current genetic spatial structure may bear a signal of past changes in population sizes and past patterns of gene flow rather than reflect the current demographic structure or landscape structure. We analyse this question with demographic data for 10 years, using the Rand index to assess the similarity between the genetic, demographic, and landscape spatial structures. Our results show that the current genetic spatial structure is better explained by the past rather than by the current demographic spatial structure or by the spatial configuration of the habitat in the landscape. Furthermore, current genetic diversity is significantly explained by past metapopulation sizes. The time lag between major demographic events and change in the genetic spatial structure and diversity has implications for the study of spatial dynamics.
自1991年以来,人们一直在芬兰奥兰群岛对格兰维尔豹纹蝶(Melitaea cinxia)进行研究,在那里它作为一个典型的集合种群出现在由4000个干草地组成的大型网络中。针对该物种已开展了大量生态学研究,但由于缺乏合适的遗传标记,种群遗传学研究受到了阻碍。在此,我们利用为格兰维尔豹纹蝶开发的单核苷酸多态性和微卫星,研究种群统计学和遗传空间结构之间的对应关系。鉴于集合种群的动态性质,当前的遗传空间结构可能带有过去种群大小变化和过去基因流动模式的信号,而不是反映当前的种群统计学结构或景观结构。我们使用10年的种群统计学数据来分析这个问题,利用兰德指数评估遗传、种群统计学和景观空间结构之间的相似性。我们的结果表明,当前的遗传空间结构用过去的情况来解释比用当前的种群统计学空间结构或景观中栖息地的空间配置来解释更好。此外,过去集合种群的大小能显著解释当前的遗传多样性。主要种群统计学事件与遗传空间结构及多样性变化之间的时间滞后对空间动态研究具有启示意义。