Hamill Sarah, Neill Sidney D, Madden Robert H
Department of Food Science, Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland.
J Food Prot. 2008 Apr;71(4):850-4. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-71.4.850.
In order to determine the most effective protocol for the isolation of Arcobacter spp. from retail packs of beef, three published methods (A, B, and C) were selected. In addition, a modified version of method B was studied (method D). The ability of the four methods to isolate Arcobacter from standardized beef samples (n = 80) was compared with presumptive Arcobacter isolates being identified to genus and species level, using multiplex PCR methods. The presence of Arcobacter in enrichment broths was also investigated using PCR techniques. Overall, the modified enrichment and selection media of Johnson and Murano (method D) gave the highest recovery of Arcobacter. Recovery using these media was enhanced by incubating the enrichment and selection media in a microaerobic cabinet rather than air, and the inclusion of streaking the enrichment broth onto selective agar after 24 h in addition to 48 h. Method D yielded significantly more Arcobacter-positive samples of beef (P < 0.01) than did the three other methods investigated.
为了确定从零售包装牛肉中分离弓形杆菌属最有效的方案,选择了三种已发表的方法(方法A、B和C)。此外,还研究了方法B的改良版本(方法D)。使用多重PCR方法,将这四种方法从标准化牛肉样品(n = 80)中分离弓形杆菌的能力与鉴定到属和种水平的推定弓形杆菌分离株进行了比较。还使用PCR技术研究了增菌肉汤中弓形杆菌的存在情况。总体而言,Johnson和Murano改良的增菌和选择培养基(方法D)对弓形杆菌的回收率最高。通过在微需氧箱而非空气中孵育增菌和选择培养基,以及除48小时外,在24小时后将增菌肉汤划线接种到选择性琼脂上,使用这些培养基的回收率得到了提高。与其他三种研究方法相比,方法D产生的牛肉弓形杆菌阳性样品显著更多(P < 0.01)。