van Wingerden Jan-Paul, Vleeming Andry, Ronchetti Inge
Spine & Joint Centre, the Netherlands, Westerlaan, 3016 CK Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 15;33(11):E334-41. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318170fcf6.
This cohort study compares motion characteristics during forward bending of a group of chronic female patients either with low back pain (LBP) or pelvic girdle pain (PGP) and healthy subjects using computer-video analysis.
This study determines whether subcategories of back pain patients could be distinguished by motion characteristics of the pelvis and lumbar spine.
Compared with healthy subjects, patients with low back pain bend forward in distinct manners. Clustering these motion patterns into specific patient subgroups has been challenging since a basis for subcategorizing was lacking. Chronic LBP can be distinguished from PGP using specific evidence-based diagnostic tests. This allows comparing the motion characteristics of subgroups of chronic patients with either LBP or PGP.
Forward bending was recorded in both female patients groups and healthy female individuals, using a computer video analysis system. Trunk motion, pelvic tilt, and lumbar lordosis are represented as sagittal plane angles. From these angles, the relative contribution of the lumbar spine and hip joint to forward bending can be derived.
Specific and discriminating motion characteristics were found between groups. During erect stance in the PGP group, the pelvis is significantly tilted backwards. At maximally forward bending, the ROM of the trunk is limited in all patient groups, but only the PGP group has significantly limited hip motion. During the initial part of forward bending, lumbar motion is increased in PGP patients and decreased in LBP patients. In the final part of forward bending contribution of the lumbar spine is increased in both patient groups.
BP and PGP patients show specific, consistent, and distinct motion patterns. These motion patterns are assumed to be functional compensation strategies, following altered neuromuscular coordination.
这项队列研究使用计算机视频分析比较了一组患有下腰痛(LBP)或骨盆带疼痛(PGP)的慢性女性患者与健康受试者在向前弯腰时的运动特征。
本研究确定背痛患者的亚类是否可以通过骨盆和腰椎的运动特征来区分。
与健康受试者相比,下腰痛患者向前弯腰的方式不同。由于缺乏亚分类的依据,将这些运动模式聚类为特定的患者亚组一直具有挑战性。慢性下腰痛可以通过特定的循证诊断测试与骨盆带疼痛区分开来。这使得可以比较患有下腰痛或骨盆带疼痛的慢性患者亚组的运动特征。
使用计算机视频分析系统记录女性患者组和健康女性个体的向前弯腰情况。躯干运动、骨盆倾斜和腰椎前凸以矢状面角度表示。从这些角度可以得出腰椎和髋关节对向前弯腰的相对贡献。
在各组之间发现了特定的、有区分性的运动特征。在骨盆带疼痛组直立站立时,骨盆明显向后倾斜。在最大程度向前弯腰时,所有患者组的躯干活动范围均受限,但只有骨盆带疼痛组的髋关节活动明显受限。在向前弯腰的初始阶段,骨盆带疼痛患者的腰椎运动增加,而下腰痛患者的腰椎运动减少。在向前弯腰的最后阶段,两个患者组中腰椎的贡献都增加了。
下腰痛和骨盆带疼痛患者表现出特定的、一致的和明显的运动模式。这些运动模式被认为是在神经肌肉协调改变后形成的功能补偿策略。