• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童言语识别分数:言语可懂度指数以及年龄和听力水平的熟练度因素。

Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.

作者信息

Scollie Susan D

机构信息

School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2008 Aug;29(4):543-56. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181734a02.

DOI:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181734a02
PMID:18469717
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to predict consonant recognition scores of adults, children, and children with hearing impairment, using the Speech Intelligibility Index (SII). It was hypothesized that an adult-derived transfer function would be insufficient to predict the scores for children, and that transfer functions for normally hearing listeners would be insufficient to predict scores for children with hearing impairment. Proficiency corrections for age and hearing loss were explored.

DESIGN

A 21-consonant test of speech recognition was applied across five signal to noise ratios in a forced choice procedure. Four adults (aged 27-32 yrs), 15 children with normal hearing (aged 6.6-16.9 yrs), and 14 children with mild to severe hearing loss (aged 7.5-18 yrs) participated. The SII was computed for each listener and each test condition using the one-third octave band method. Transfer functions were fitted to the data of each group.

RESULTS

The adult-derived transfer function over-predicted the children's scores. Significant increases in prediction accuracy were obtained when the effects of age and hearing loss were incorporated into the transfer function as proficiency factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The SII could successfully be used to predict speech recognition scores for both adults and children, once the effects of age and hearing loss were included in the development of a transfer function. Specific proficiency factors developed here may not generalize to other data sets. Nonetheless, the results shed light on factors to consider when using the SII to predict children's speech recognition scores.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是使用言语可懂度指数(SII)预测成人、儿童以及听力受损儿童的辅音识别分数。研究假设是,源自成人的传递函数不足以预测儿童的分数,并且正常听力听众的传递函数不足以预测听力受损儿童的分数。探讨了针对年龄和听力损失的熟练度校正。

设计

在强制选择程序中,针对五个信噪比应用了一项包含21个辅音的言语识别测试。四名成人(年龄在27 - 32岁之间)、15名听力正常的儿童(年龄在6.6 - 16.9岁之间)以及14名轻度至重度听力损失的儿童(年龄在7.5 - 18岁之间)参与了研究。使用1/3倍频程带方法为每位听众和每个测试条件计算SII。为每组数据拟合传递函数。

结果

源自成人的传递函数高估了儿童的分数。当将年龄和听力损失的影响作为熟练度因素纳入传递函数时,预测准确性得到了显著提高。

结论

一旦在传递函数的开发中纳入年龄和听力损失的影响,SII可以成功地用于预测成人和儿童的言语识别分数。此处开发的特定熟练度因素可能不适用于其他数据集。尽管如此,这些结果揭示了在使用SII预测儿童言语识别分数时需要考虑的因素。

相似文献

1
Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.儿童言语识别分数:言语可懂度指数以及年龄和听力水平的熟练度因素。
Ear Hear. 2008 Aug;29(4):543-56. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181734a02.
2
Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.正常听力和听力受损听众在连贯言语测试中的可听度指数预测。
Ear Hear. 2003 Feb;24(1):71-88. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000052748.94309.8A.
3
Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.噪声和混响对正常听力儿童和成人言语识别性能的联合影响。
Ear Hear. 2010 Jun;31(3):336-44. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d3d514.
4
Establishment of age-specific normative data for the canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children.为加拿大法语版儿童噪声环境下听力测试建立特定年龄的标准数据。
Ear Hear. 2008 Jun;29(3):453-66. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000310792.55221.0c.
5
Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.语音识别对时间和频谱失真材料的影响:年龄和听力损失的作用。
Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):349-66. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318242571c.
6
Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.噪声中的语音识别:估计基底膜反应中压缩非线性的影响。
Ear Hear. 2007 Sep;28(5):682-93. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31812f7156.
7
Hearing assessment in pre-school children with speech delay.对有语言发育迟缓的学龄前儿童进行听力评估。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2006 Sep;33(3):259-63. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2005.11.013. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
8
Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study.瑞典听力受损学龄前儿童群体的言语和语言发展:一项横断面研究
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Jul;71(7):1061-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.03.016. Epub 2007 May 18.
9
A descriptive analysis of language and speech skills in 4- to 5-yr-old children with hearing loss.对 4 至 5 岁听力损失儿童的语言和言语技能进行描述性分析。
Ear Hear. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):605-16. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31821348ae.
10
Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 in multi-talker babble: a preliminary report.多说话者嘈杂环境中的西北大学听觉测试第6号:初步报告。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002 Jan-Feb;39(1):105-13.

引用本文的文献

1
The Speech Intelligibility Index: Tutorial and Applications for Children Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing.言语可懂度指数:针对失聪及听力障碍儿童的教程与应用
Am J Audiol. 2025 Sep 2;34(3):467-483. doi: 10.1044/2025_AJA-24-00267. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
2
Comparing criteria for deviation from hearing aid prescriptive targets in children.比较儿童助听器验配目标偏差的标准。
Int J Audiol. 2024 Dec;63(12):997-1008. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2293645. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
3
Predicting Hearing aid Benefit Using Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Children With Hearing Loss.
使用言语诱发包络跟随反应预测听力损失儿童的助听器获益。
Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231151468. doi: 10.1177/23312165231151468.
4
Speech Discrimination in Infancy Predicts Language Outcomes at 30 Months for Both Children with Normal Hearing and Those with Hearing Differences.婴儿期的言语辨别能力可预测听力正常儿童和听力有差异儿童30个月时的语言发展结果。
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 30;11(19):5821. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195821.
5
Spectral Resolution Development in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants: A Review of Behavioral Studies.正常听力儿童和人工耳蜗植入儿童的频谱分辨率发展:行为研究综述。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Apr 4;65(4):1646-1658. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00307. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
6
Relationship between Behavioral Infant Speech Perception and Hearing Age for Children with Hearing Loss.听力损失儿童的婴儿行为言语感知与听力年龄之间的关系。
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 30;10(19):4566. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194566.
7
Mismatched response predicts behavioral speech discrimination outcomes in infants with hearing loss and normal hearing.不匹配的反应可预测听力损失和听力正常婴儿的行为言语辨别结果。
Infancy. 2021 Mar;26(2):327-348. doi: 10.1111/infa.12386. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
8
Audibility-Based Hearing Aid Fitting Criteria for Children With Mild Bilateral Hearing Loss.基于可听度的儿童双侧轻度听力损失助听器验配标准。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Jan 8;51(1):55-67. doi: 10.1044/2019_LSHSS-OCHL-19-0021.
9
Longitudinal Speech Recognition in Noise in Children: Effects of Hearing Status and Vocabulary.儿童噪声环境下的纵向语音识别:听力状况和词汇量的影响
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 25;10:2421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02421. eCollection 2019.
10
Auditory, Cognitive, and Linguistic Factors Predict Speech Recognition in Adverse Listening Conditions for Children With Hearing Loss.听觉、认知和语言因素可预测听力损失儿童在不利聆听条件下的言语识别能力。
Front Neurosci. 2019 Oct 15;13:1093. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01093. eCollection 2019.