da Fonseca Pacheco D, Klein A, de Castro Perez A, da Fonseca Pacheco C M, de Francischi J N, Duarte I D G
Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Biological Sciences, UFMG, Av. Antônio Carlos, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Br J Pharmacol. 2008 Jul;154(5):1143-9. doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.175. Epub 2008 May 12.
Although participation of opioids in antinociception induced by cannabinoids has been documented, there is little information regarding the participation of cannabinoids in the antinociceptive mechanisms of opioids. The aim of the present study was to determine whether endocannabinoids could be involved in peripheral antinociception induced by activation of mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptors.
Nociceptive thresholds to mechanical stimulation of rat paws treated with intraplantar prostaglandin E2 (PGE2, 2 microg) to induce hyperalgesia were measured 3 h after injection using an algesimetric apparatus. Opioid agonists morphine (200 microg), (+)-4-[(alphaR)-alpha-((2S,5R)-4-Allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-methoxybenzyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide (SNC80) (80 microg), bremazocine (50 microg); cannabinoid receptor antagonists N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (AM251) (20-80 microg), 6-iodo-2-methyl-1-[2-(4-morpholinyl)ethyl]-1H-indol-3-yl(4-methoxyphenyl) methanone (AM630) (12.5-100 microg); and an inhibitor of methyl arachidonyl fluorophosphonate (MAFP) (1-4 microg) were also injected in the paw.
The CB1-selective cannabinoid receptor antagonist AM251 completely reversed the peripheral antinociception induced by morphine in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, the CB2-selective cannabinoid receptor antagonist AM630 elicited partial antagonism of this effect. In addition, the administration of the fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor, MAFP, enhanced the antinociception induced by morphine. The cannabinoid receptor antagonists AM251 and AM630 did not modify the antinociceptive effect of SNC80 or bremazocine. The antagonists alone did not cause any hyperalgesic or antinociceptive effect.
Our results provide evidence for the involvement of endocannabinoids, in the peripheral antinociception induced by the mu-opioid receptor agonist morphine. The release of cannabinoids appears not to be involved in the peripheral antinociceptive effect induced by kappa- and delta-opioid receptor agonists.
尽管已有文献记载阿片类药物参与大麻素诱导的抗伤害感受过程,但关于大麻素参与阿片类药物抗伤害感受机制的信息却很少。本研究的目的是确定内源性大麻素是否参与由μ-、δ-和κ-阿片受体激活所诱导的外周抗伤害感受。
使用痛觉测量仪,在注射前列腺素E2(PGE2,2微克)诱导大鼠足底痛觉过敏3小时后,测量大鼠足底经机械刺激的痛觉阈值。阿片类激动剂吗啡(200微克)、(+)-4- [(αR)-α-((2S,5R)-4-烯丙基-2,5-二甲基-1-哌嗪基)-3-甲氧基苄基]-N,N-二乙基苯甲酰胺(SNC80)(80微克)、布马佐辛(50微克);大麻素受体拮抗剂N-(哌啶-1-基)-5-(4-碘苯基)-1-(2,4-二氯苯基)-4-甲基-1H-吡唑-3-甲酰胺(AM251)(20 - 80微克)、6-碘-2-甲基-1- [2-(4-吗啉基)乙基]-1H-吲哚-3-基(4-甲氧基苯基)甲酮(AM630)(12.5 - 100微克);以及甲基花生四烯酸氟磷酸酯(MAFP)抑制剂(1 - 4微克)也注射到足爪中。
CB1选择性大麻素受体拮抗剂AM251以剂量依赖性方式完全逆转了吗啡诱导的外周抗伤害感受。相比之下CB2选择性大麻素受体拮抗剂AM630对这种效应产生部分拮抗作用。此外,脂肪酸酰胺水解酶抑制剂MAFP的给药增强了吗啡诱导的抗伤害感受。大麻素受体拮抗剂AM251和AM630并未改变SNC80或布马佐辛的抗伤害感受作用。单独使用拮抗剂不会引起任何痛觉过敏或抗伤害感受作用。
我们的结果为内源性大麻素参与μ-阿片受体激动剂吗啡诱导的外周抗伤害感受提供了证据。大麻素的释放似乎不参与κ-和δ-阿片受体激动剂诱导的外周抗伤害感受作用。