Suppr超能文献

游离组织移植治疗面瘫。

Free tissue transfer for the treatment of facial paralysis.

作者信息

Chuang David Chwei-Chin

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taipei-Linkou, Taiwan.

出版信息

Facial Plast Surg. 2008 May;24(2):194-203. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1075834.

Abstract

Long-standing facial paralysis requires the introduction of viable, innervated dynamic muscle to restore facial movement. The options include regional muscle transfer and microvascular free tissue transfer. There are advantages and disadvantages of each. Briefly, the regional muscle transfer procedures are reliable and provide immediate return of movement. However, the movement is not of a spontaneous mimetic nature. Free tissue transfer, in contrast, offers the possibility of synchronous, mimetic movement. It does, however, require a prolonged healing time in comparison with that of regional muscle transfer. The choice is made by physician and patient together, taking into account their preferences and biases. Muscle-alone free tissue transfer is our preferred option for reanimation of uncomplicated facial paralysis without skin or soft tissue deficits. Combined muscle and other tissue (most are skin flap) is another preferred option for more challenging complex facial paralysis with skin or soft tissue deficits after tumor excision. Gracilis flap is the author's first choice of muscle transplantation for both reconstructions. From 1986 to 2006, gracilis functioning free muscle transplantation (FFMT) was performed at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital for facial reanimation in 249 cases of facial paralysis. The main etiology is postoperative complication and Bell's palsy. The innervating nerve comes mostly from contralateral facial nerve branches, few from ipsilateral facial nerve due to tumor ablation, and from ipsilateral motor branch to masseter or spinal accessory nerve due to Möbius syndrome. We have evolutionally used a short nerve graft (10 to 15 cm) to cross the face in the first stage; after a 6- to 9-month waiting period, gracilis FFMT was performed for the second stage of the reconstruction. The technique of evolution has shown encouraging results to achieve the goal of rapid restoration and fewer scars on the donor leg.

摘要

长期面瘫需要引入有活力、有神经支配的动态肌肉来恢复面部运动。选择包括区域肌肉转移和微血管游离组织转移。每种方法都有优缺点。简而言之,区域肌肉转移手术可靠,能使面部运动立即恢复。然而,这种运动并非自发模仿性质。相比之下,游离组织转移提供了同步模仿运动的可能性。不过,与区域肌肉转移相比,它需要更长的愈合时间。选择由医生和患者共同做出,同时考虑他们的偏好和倾向。单纯肌肉游离组织转移是我们治疗无皮肤或软组织缺损的单纯性面瘫恢复面部功能的首选方法。肌肉与其他组织(大多数是皮瓣)联合转移是治疗肿瘤切除后伴有皮肤或软组织缺损的更具挑战性的复杂性面瘫的另一种首选方法。股薄肌皮瓣是作者进行这两种重建手术时肌肉移植的首选。1986年至2006年,长庚纪念医院对249例面瘫患者进行了股薄肌功能性游离肌肉移植(FFMT)以恢复面部功能。主要病因是术后并发症和贝尔面瘫。支配神经大多来自对侧面神经分支,因肿瘤切除很少来自同侧面神经,因莫比乌斯综合征来自同侧咬肌运动支或副神经。我们在第一阶段逐渐采用一段短神经移植物(10至15厘米)穿过面部;经过6至9个月的等待期后,进行第二阶段的股薄肌FFMT重建手术。这种逐步改进的技术已显示出令人鼓舞的结果,实现了快速恢复且供区腿部疤痕较少的目标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验