Thuerauf Norbert, Gossler Andrea, Lunkenheimer Jens, Lunkenheimer Birgit, Maihöfner Christian, Bleich Stefan, Kornhuber Johannes, Markovic Katrin, Reulbach Udo
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Neurosci Lett. 2008 Jun 20;438(2):228-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.04.038. Epub 2008 May 9.
An earlier study in humans comparing the olfactory sensitivity of both nostrils revealed a small but significant advantage of the right nostril for detection and for olfactory quality discrimination. However lateralization was not evaluated for the perception of odor intensity and hedonic evaluation (pleasantness/unpleasantness). Thus we investigated lateralization of olfactory intensity and hedonic evaluation in right-handed healthy volunteers (n=186) from the HeDoS-F database (Hedonic Database of Smell-Franconia). For olfactory evaluation the Sniffin' Stick Test was employed with the parameters detection, discrimination, identification and extended by analogue hedonic and intensity rating scales. Over all odors subjects rated the perceived intensity significantly higher following stimulation of the right compared to the left nostril. The analysis of the single odors of the Sniffin' Stick Test consistently confirmed higher intensity ratings for the right compared to the left nostril reaching a statistically significant difference for 10 out of 16 odors. In contrast we found no significant differences between the nostrils for the hedonic estimates over all odors. Differences in odor detection, discrimination and identification did not reach a statistically significant level, but for all these parameters the scores of the right nostril were slightly higher compared to the left nostril. For odor identification, however, a statistical tendency was observed. Based on our results we concluded that olfactory intensity estimates represent the most sensitive parameter of olfactory lateralization.
一项早期针对人类的研究比较了两个鼻孔的嗅觉敏感度,结果显示右侧鼻孔在气味检测和嗅觉质量辨别方面存在虽小但显著的优势。然而,对于气味强度感知和享乐评价(愉悦/不悦)未进行偏侧化评估。因此,我们从HeDoS-F数据库(弗兰肯尼亚嗅觉享乐数据库)中选取了186名右利手健康志愿者,研究嗅觉强度和享乐评价的偏侧化情况。对于嗅觉评估,采用了嗅觉棒测试,其参数包括检测、辨别、识别,并通过类似的享乐和强度评级量表进行扩展。在所有气味中,与左侧鼻孔相比,右侧鼻孔受到刺激后,受试者对感知到的强度评分显著更高。对嗅觉棒测试中单一气味的分析一致证实,与左侧鼻孔相比,右侧鼻孔的强度评分更高,16种气味中有10种达到了统计学显著差异。相比之下,我们发现所有气味的享乐估计在两个鼻孔之间没有显著差异。气味检测、辨别和识别方面的差异未达到统计学显著水平,但就所有这些参数而言,右侧鼻孔的得分略高于左侧鼻孔。不过,在气味识别方面,观察到了一种统计趋势。基于我们的结果,我们得出结论,嗅觉强度估计是嗅觉偏侧化最敏感的参数。