• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

气味享乐特征(OHP):一种日常气味的自评工具。

Odor Hedonic Profile (OHP): a self-rating tool of everyday odors.

作者信息

Charlotte Bontempi, Laurence Jacquot, Gérard Brand

机构信息

Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.

Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, CNRS, Inrae, AgroSup Dijon, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2023 Aug 4;17:1181674. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1181674. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fnins.2023.1181674
PMID:37599991
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10436339/
Abstract

Odor hedonic estimation (pleasant/unpleasant) is considered the first and one of the most important dimensions in odor perception. Although there are several published scales that rate odor hedonicity, most of them use odorants that induce biases related to stimulus properties or test conditions and make difficult clinical or industrial applications. Thus, this study aimed to propose a model of odor hedonic profile (OHP) based on 14 items related to everyday odors without stimulus. The OHP is a self-rating tool based on the hedonic estimate representation and allows the determination of specific profiles, i.e., "conservative," "neutral," "liberal," "negative olfactory alliesthesia," and "positive olfactory alliesthesia." It can be useful in different contexts (e.g., food studies) and general pathologies (e.g., eating disorders) or pathologies with mood/emotional disturbances (e.g., depression).

摘要

气味享乐估计(愉悦/不愉悦)被认为是气味感知的首要且最重要的维度之一。尽管有几种已发表的对气味享乐性进行评分的量表,但其中大多数使用的气味剂会引发与刺激特性或测试条件相关的偏差,从而使临床或工业应用变得困难。因此,本研究旨在基于14项与日常无刺激气味相关的项目,提出一种气味享乐特征模型(OHP)。OHP是一种基于享乐估计表示的自评工具,能够确定特定的特征,即“保守型”、“中性型”、“自由型”、“负性嗅觉变适”和“正性嗅觉变适”。它在不同背景(如食品研究)以及一般病症(如饮食失调)或伴有情绪/情感障碍的病症(如抑郁症)中可能会有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b5b/10436339/09c42083b954/fnins-17-1181674-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b5b/10436339/c6112155c55c/fnins-17-1181674-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b5b/10436339/4f05eb299e37/fnins-17-1181674-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b5b/10436339/6e3aed3f0caf/fnins-17-1181674-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b5b/10436339/963816aa3c15/fnins-17-1181674-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b5b/10436339/09c42083b954/fnins-17-1181674-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b5b/10436339/c6112155c55c/fnins-17-1181674-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b5b/10436339/4f05eb299e37/fnins-17-1181674-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b5b/10436339/6e3aed3f0caf/fnins-17-1181674-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b5b/10436339/963816aa3c15/fnins-17-1181674-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b5b/10436339/09c42083b954/fnins-17-1181674-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Odor Hedonic Profile (OHP): a self-rating tool of everyday odors.气味享乐特征(OHP):一种日常气味的自评工具。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Aug 4;17:1181674. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1181674. eCollection 2023.
2
Diet and odor hedonic ratings: comparative study between vegetarians, flexitarians, and omnivores.饮食与气味愉悦感评价:素食者、弹性素食者和杂食者之间的比较研究。
Nutr Neurosci. 2023 Dec;26(12):1232-1242. doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2022.2145425. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
3
Odor frequency and odor annoyance. Part I: assessment of frequency, intensity and hedonic tone of environmental odors in the field.气味频率与气味烦恼。第一部分:实地环境气味的频率、强度及愉悦度评估
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008 May;81(6):671-82. doi: 10.1007/s00420-007-0259-z. Epub 2007 Oct 12.
4
A study on the relationship between odor hedonic ratings and individual odor detection threshold.一项关于气味愉悦评分与个体气味觉察阈关系的研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 2;12(1):18482. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23068-1.
5
Variability in odor hedonic perception: A challenge for neurosensory and behavioral research.气味愉悦感知的可变性:神经感官和行为研究的挑战。
Behav Neurosci. 2024 Oct;138(5):301-313. doi: 10.1037/bne0000595. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
6
Auditory-olfactory integration: congruent or pleasant sounds amplify odor pleasantness.听觉-嗅觉整合:一致或令人愉悦的声音会增强气味的愉悦感。
Chem Senses. 2011 Mar;36(3):301-9. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjq129. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
7
Development of Odor Hedonics: Experience-Dependent Ontogeny of Circuits Supporting Maternal and Predator Odor Responses in Rats.气味享乐主义的发展:大鼠中支持母体和捕食者气味反应的神经回路的经验依赖性个体发生
J Neurosci. 2016 Jun 22;36(25):6634-50. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0632-16.2016.
8
Sex Differences in Odor Hedonic Perception: An Overview.气味享乐感知中的性别差异:综述
Front Neurosci. 2021 Oct 18;15:764520. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.764520. eCollection 2021.
9
fMRI of emotional responses to odors: influence of hedonic valence and judgment, handedness, and gender.对气味情绪反应的功能磁共振成像:享乐效价与判断、利手性及性别的影响
Neuroimage. 2003 Oct;20(2):713-28. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00388-4.
10
Hedonic appreciation and verbal description of pleasant and unpleasant odors in untrained, trainee cooks, flavorists, and perfumers.未受训厨师、厨师培训生、调香师和调香师对愉快和不愉快气味的愉悦欣赏和口头描述。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jan 24;5:12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00012. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Diet and odor hedonic ratings: comparative study between vegetarians, flexitarians, and omnivores.饮食与气味愉悦感评价:素食者、弹性素食者和杂食者之间的比较研究。
Nutr Neurosci. 2023 Dec;26(12):1232-1242. doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2022.2145425. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
2
A study on the relationship between odor hedonic ratings and individual odor detection threshold.一项关于气味愉悦评分与个体气味觉察阈关系的研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 2;12(1):18482. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23068-1.
3
Sex Differences in Odor Hedonic Perception: An Overview.气味享乐感知中的性别差异:综述
Front Neurosci. 2021 Oct 18;15:764520. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.764520. eCollection 2021.
4
Assessment of odor hedonic perception: the Sniffin' sticks parosmia test (SSParoT).嗅觉愉悦感知评估:嗅吸棒嗅觉障碍测试(SSParoT)。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 22;10(1):18019. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74967-0.
5
Olfactory markers for depression: Differences between bipolar and unipolar patients.抑郁症的嗅觉标志物:双相和单相患者的差异。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0237565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237565. eCollection 2020.
6
The Chemosensory Pleasure Scale: A New Assessment for Measuring Hedonic Smell and Taste Capacities.《化学感觉愉悦量表》:一种用于评估愉悦性嗅觉和味觉能力的新评估工具。
Chem Senses. 2019 Sep 7;44(7):457-464. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjz040.
7
Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis.人类嗅觉中的性别差异:一项荟萃分析。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 13;10:242. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00242. eCollection 2019.
8
Alterations in emotional responses (pleasantness/unpleasantness) induced by sniffing food odors during chemotherapy in patients with lung cancer.肺癌患者化疗期间嗅闻食物气味所引发的情绪反应(愉悦/不悦)变化。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;48(10):906-912. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyy123.
9
Hedonic Assessment of Odors: A Comparison of Two Sensory Scales for Use with Alzheimer's Disease Patients and Elderly Individuals.气味愉悦度评估:两种感官量表在阿尔茨海默病患者和老年人中的比较。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;61(3):929-938. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170433.
10
The Body Odor Disgust Scale (BODS): Development and Validation of a Novel Olfactory Disgust Assessment.体臭厌恶量表(BODS):一种新型嗅觉厌恶评估方法的开发与验证
Chem Senses. 2017 Jul 1;42(6):499-508. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjw107.