• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[血管生成在肾癌中的作用]

[The role of angiogenesis in renal carcinoma].

作者信息

Bussolati B, Satolli M A, Camussi G

机构信息

Laboratorio di Fisiopatologia Renale e Vascolare, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Centro Interdipartimentale di Biotecnologie, Ospedale Molinette, Università degli Studi, Corso Dogliotti 14, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

G Ital Nefrol. 2008 May-Jun;25(3):297-305.

PMID:18473301
Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma is characterized by intense angiogenesis associated with the inactivation of the von Hippel-Lindau oncosuppressor gene with consequent hyperexpression of proangiogenic factors. Functional and molecular characterization of renal tumor endothelial cells has demonstrated an increase in angiogenesis and cell survival. The proangiogenic phenotype was due to hyperactivation of the PI3K/Akt/mTor pathway, which downregulates the synthesis of the antiangiogenic factor thrombospondin-1. Moreover, renal tumor endothelial cells presented an immature and embryonic phenotype with expression of the embryonic kidney-specific gene PAX-2. It is conceivable that the endothelium present in renal carcinoma is heterogeneous, with a possible origin from adjacent vessels, resident or circulating stem cells, or from the tumor cells themselves. The relevance of the angiogenic process in renal carcinoma is underlined by the therapeutic effect of antiangiogenic drugs. Different drugs against VEGF, such as the anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, and small molecule tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, such as sunitinib and sorafenib, showed a clinical effect in patients with metastatic carcinoma. However, antiangiogenic therapy, although beneficial, is not sufficient per se. These studies suggest a role for the angiogenic program in the growth and dissemination of renal carcinoma and indicate the need for new therapeutic strategies.

摘要

肾细胞癌的特征是强烈的血管生成,这与冯·希佩尔-林道抑癌基因失活相关,进而导致促血管生成因子的过度表达。肾肿瘤内皮细胞的功能和分子特征表明血管生成和细胞存活增加。促血管生成表型归因于PI3K/Akt/mTor通路的过度激活,该通路下调抗血管生成因子血小板反应蛋白-1的合成。此外,肾肿瘤内皮细胞呈现出不成熟的胚胎表型,并表达胚胎肾特异性基因PAX-2。可以想象,肾癌中的内皮细胞是异质性的,可能起源于相邻血管、驻留或循环干细胞,或肿瘤细胞本身。抗血管生成药物的治疗效果突显了血管生成过程在肾癌中的相关性。不同的抗VEGF药物,如抗VEGF单克隆抗体贝伐单抗,以及小分子酪氨酸激酶抑制剂,如舒尼替尼和索拉非尼,在转移性癌患者中显示出临床疗效。然而,抗血管生成治疗尽管有益,但本身并不足够。这些研究表明血管生成程序在肾癌的生长和扩散中起作用,并表明需要新的治疗策略。

相似文献

1
[The role of angiogenesis in renal carcinoma].[血管生成在肾癌中的作用]
G Ital Nefrol. 2008 May-Jun;25(3):297-305.
2
[Angiogenesis and renal cell carcinoma].[血管生成与肾细胞癌]
Bull Cancer. 2007 Jul;94 Spec No:S232-40.
3
[Angiogenesis targeting in renal carcinomas].[肾癌中的血管生成靶向治疗]
Bull Cancer. 2007;94(7 Suppl):F223-6.
4
Vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy in renal cell carcinoma: current status and future directions.肾细胞癌中血管内皮生长因子靶向治疗:现状与未来方向
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Feb 15;13(4):1098-106. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1989.
5
Progress in the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)治疗的进展
Aktuelle Urol. 2010 Jan;41 Suppl 1:S57-60. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247237. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
6
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.转移性肾细胞癌的靶向治疗
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Dec 10;24(35):5601-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.5415.
7
[Novelties in the treatment for advanced renal-cell cancer].[晚期肾细胞癌治疗的新进展]
Orv Hetil. 2011 Apr 24;152(17):655-62. doi: 10.1556/OH.2011.29100.
8
Molecular biology of renal cell carcinoma.肾细胞癌的分子生物学
Clin Transl Oncol. 2006 Oct;8(10):706-10. doi: 10.1007/s12094-006-0116-7.
9
Sunitinib, sorafenib and mTOR inhibitors in renal cancer.舒尼替尼、索拉非尼及mTOR抑制剂在肾癌中的应用
J BUON. 2007 Sep;12 Suppl 1:S151-62.
10
[Angiogenesis inhibition: review of the activity of sorafenib, sunitinib and bevacizumab].血管生成抑制:索拉非尼、舒尼替尼和贝伐单抗活性综述
Bull Cancer. 2010;97:29-43. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2010.1068.