• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰的全民强制医疗保险:美国的一个模式?

Universal mandatory health insurance in the Netherlands: a model for the United States?

作者信息

van de Ven Wynand P M M, Schut Frederik T

机构信息

Institute of Health Policy and Management at Erasmus University in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):771-81. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.771.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.771
PMID:18474971
Abstract

Policy analysts consider the Netherlands health system a possible model for the United States. Since 2006 all Dutch citizens have to buy standardized individual health insurance coverage from a private insurer. Consumers have an annual choice among insurers, and insurers can selectively contract or integrate with health care providers. Subsidies make health insurance affordable for everyone. A Risk Equalization Fund compensates insurers for enrollees with predictably high medical expenses. The reform is a work in progress. So far the emphasis has been on the health insurance market. The challenge is now to successfully reform the market for the provision of health care.

摘要

政策分析人士认为荷兰医疗体系有可能成为美国的典范。自2006年起,所有荷兰公民都必须从私人保险公司购买标准化的个人医疗保险。消费者每年可在保险公司之间进行选择,保险公司可以有选择地与医疗服务提供者签约或整合。补贴使每个人都能负担得起医疗保险。风险均等基金对承保预计医疗费用高的参保人的保险公司进行补偿。这项改革仍在进行中。到目前为止,重点一直放在医疗保险市场。现在的挑战是成功改革医疗服务提供市场。

相似文献

1
Universal mandatory health insurance in the Netherlands: a model for the United States?荷兰的全民强制医疗保险:美国的一个模式?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):771-81. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.771.
2
An experiment with regulated competition and individual mandates for universal health care: the new Dutch health insurance system.一项关于全民医保的规范竞争与个人强制参保的实验:荷兰新医保体系
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2008 Dec;33(6):1031-55. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2008-033.
3
Is Dutch health care a model for the U.S. health system?荷兰的医疗保健体系能成为美国医疗系统的典范吗?
Bus Health. 1992 May;10(6):34-5, 38, 40-2.
4
Privatization within the Dutch context: a comparison of the health insurance systems of the Netherlands and the United States.荷兰的私有化:荷兰和美国的健康保险制度比较。
Health (London). 2010 Nov;14(6):603-18. doi: 10.1177/1363459309360790.
5
The individual mandate--an affordable and fair approach to achieving universal coverage.个人强制参保——实现全民医保覆盖的一种经济实惠且公平的方式。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 2;361(1):6-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0904729. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
6
German health care--towards universal access. An overview of the principles of access and benefits.德国医疗保健——迈向全民覆盖。获得医疗服务及福利原则概述。
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 2002 Fall;18(3):673-83.
7
Not "socialized medicine"--an Israeli view of health care reform.并非“社会化医疗”——以色列对医疗改革的看法
N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 19;361(21):e46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0908269. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
8
A living model of managed competition: a conversation with Dutch health minister Ab Klink. Interview by Alain Enthoven.管理式竞争的鲜活典范:与荷兰卫生部长阿布·克林克的对话。采访人:阿兰·恩托芬
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):w196-203. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.w196. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
9
Universal coverage one head at a time--the risks and benefits of individual health insurance mandates.一次一人实现全民覆盖——个人健康保险强制参保的风险与益处
N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 10;358(15):1540-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0802027.
10
From Massachusetts to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue: aboard the health reform express.从马萨诸塞州到宾夕法尼亚大道 1600 号:登上医疗改革专列。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1106-11. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0429.

引用本文的文献

1
Price transparency in the Dutch market-based health care system: did price dispersion for similar hospital services reduce over time?荷兰基于市场的医疗保健系统中的价格透明度:类似医院服务的价格差异是否随时间推移而减少?
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Feb 22. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01759-6.
2
"I have some wishes, which are actually demands." A qualitative mixed methods study on the impact of consumerism on the therapeutic relationship in mental healthcare.“我有一些愿望,实际上是要求。”一项关于消费主义对心理保健中治疗关系影响的定性混合方法研究。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Nov 22;4:1388906. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1388906. eCollection 2024.
3
Adverse selection and consumer inertia: empirical evidence from the Dutch health insurance market.
逆向选择与消费者惰性:来自荷兰健康保险市场的实证证据
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Jun;26(4):641-651. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01725-8. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
4
Impact of Active Disinvestment on Decision-Making for Surgery in Patients With Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Qualitative Semi-structured Interview Study Among Hospital Sales Managers and Orthopedic Surgeons.积极撤资对肩峰下疼痛综合征患者手术决策的影响:一项针对医院销售经理和骨科医生的定性半结构化访谈研究
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7710. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7710. Epub 2023 Aug 13.
5
Measuring Active Purchasing in Healthcare: Analysing Reallocations of Funds Between Providers to Evaluate Purchasing Systems Performance in the Netherlands.衡量医疗保健领域的主动采购:分析供应商之间的资金重新分配以评估荷兰采购系统的绩效。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7506. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7506. Epub 2023 Sep 17.
6
Psychosocial and socioeconomic factors are most predictive of health status in patients with claudication.心理社会和社会经济因素是预测跛行患者健康状况的最重要因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jun;79(6):1473-1482.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.01.021. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
7
Doctors as Resource Stewards? Translating High-Value, Cost-Conscious Care to the Consulting Room.医生作为资源管理者?将高价值、成本意识的护理转化到会诊室中。
Health Care Anal. 2022 Dec;30(3-4):215-239. doi: 10.1007/s10728-022-00446-4. Epub 2022 May 13.
8
Can the Profitability of Medical Enterprises Be Improved After Joining China's Centralized Drug Procurement? A Difference-in-Difference Design.集中采购后医疗企业的盈利能力能否提高?—基于倍差法的研究
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 1;9:809453. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.809453. eCollection 2021.
9
Trends in socioeconomic inequality of periodontal health status among Dutch adults: a repeated cross-sectional analysis over two decades.荷兰成年人牙周健康状况的社会经济不平等趋势:二十年来的重复横断面分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jul 15;21(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01713-x.
10
Donor type and 3-month hospital readmission following kidney transplantation: results from the Netherlands organ transplant registry.供体类型与肾移植后 3 个月的院内再入院:来自荷兰器官移植登记处的结果。
BMC Nephrol. 2021 Apr 27;22(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12882-021-02363-5.