Silva Lindsay M, Coolman Marianne, Steegers Eric Ap, Jaddoe Vincent Wv, Moll Henriëtte A, Hofman Albert, Mackenbach Johan P, Raat Hein
The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
J Hypertens. 2008 Jun;26(6):1200-8. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282fcc36e.
To examine whether maternal socioeconomic status, as indicated by maternal educational level, is associated with preeclampsia, and if so, to what extent known risk factors for preeclampsia mediate the effect of educational level.
In the Generation R Study, a population-based cohort study, we examined data of 3547 pregnant women. Odds ratios of preeclampsia for low, mid-low and mid-high educational level compared with high educational level were calculated after adjustment for confounders and additional adjustment for a selection of potential mediators (family history, material factors, psychosocial factors, substance use, working conditions, preexisting medical conditions, maternal anthropometrics and blood pressure at enrollment) that individually caused more than 10% change in the odds ratio for low education.
Adjusted for the confounding effects of age, gravidity and multiple pregnancy, women with low educational level were more likely to develop preeclampsia (odds ratio 5.12; 95% confidence interval: 2.20, 11.93) than women with high educational level. After additional adjustment for financial difficulties, smoking in pregnancy, working conditions, body mass index and blood pressure at enrollment, the odds ratio was 4.91 (95% confidence interval: 1.93, 12.52).
Low maternal socioeconomic status is a strong risk factor for preeclampsia. Only a small part of this association can be explained by the mediating effects of established risk factors for preeclampsia. Further research is needed to disentangle the pathway from low socioeconomic status to preeclampsia.
探讨以母亲教育水平表示的母亲社会经济地位是否与先兆子痫相关,若相关,先兆子痫的已知危险因素在多大程度上介导了教育水平的影响。
在基于人群的队列研究“Generation R研究”中,我们检查了3547名孕妇的数据。在对混杂因素进行调整,并对一系列潜在中介因素(家族史、物质因素、心理社会因素、物质使用、工作条件、既往病史、母亲人体测量指标以及入组时的血压)进行额外调整后,计算低、中低和中高教育水平与高教育水平相比的先兆子痫比值比,这些中介因素单独导致低教育水平的比值比变化超过10%。
在对年龄、妊娠次数和多胎妊娠的混杂效应进行调整后,低教育水平的女性比高教育水平的女性更易发生先兆子痫(比值比5.12;95%置信区间:2.20, 11.93)。在对经济困难、孕期吸烟、工作条件、体重指数和入组时的血压进行额外调整后,比值比为4.91(95%置信区间:1.93, 12.52)。
母亲社会经济地位低是先兆子痫的一个重要危险因素。先兆子痫既定危险因素的中介作用仅能解释这种关联的一小部分。需要进一步研究以理清从低社会经济地位到先兆子痫的途径。