Stunell H, Buckley O, Lyburn I D, McGann G, Farrell M, Torreggiani W C
Department of Radiology, Adelaide and Meath Hospitals incorporating the National Children's Hospital , Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland.
J Postgrad Med. 2008 Apr-Jun;54(2):126-34. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.40779.
Gastrointestinal bleeding remains an important cause for emergency hospital admission with a significant related morbidity and mortality. Bleeding may relate to the upper or lower gastrointestinal tracts and clinical history and examination may guide investigations to the more likely source of bleeding. The now widespread availability of endoscopic equipment has made a huge impact on the rapid identification of the bleeding source. However, there remains a large group of patients with negative or failed endoscopy, in whom additional techniques are required to identify the source of bleeding. In the past, catheter angiography and radionuclide red cell labeling techniques were the preferred 'next step' modalities used to aid in identifying a bleeding source within the gastrointestinal tract. However, these techniques are time-consuming and of limited sensitivity and specificity. In addition, catheter angiography is a relatively invasive procedure. In recent years, computerized tomography (CT) has undergone major technological advances in its speed, resolution, multiplanar techniques and angiographic abilities. It has allowed excellent visualization of the both the small and large bowel allowing precise anatomical visualization of many causes of gastrointestinal tract (GIT) bleeding. In addition, recent advances in multiphasic imaging now allow direct visualization of bleeding into the bowel. In many centers CT has therefore become the 'next step' technique in identifying a bleeding source within the GIT following negative or failed endoscopy in the acute setting. In this review article, we review the current literature and discuss the current status of CT as a modality in investigating the patient with GIT bleeding.
胃肠道出血仍然是急诊入院的一个重要原因,具有显著的相关发病率和死亡率。出血可能与上消化道或下消化道有关,临床病史和检查可指导对更可能的出血源进行调查。如今,内镜设备的广泛应用对快速识别出血源产生了巨大影响。然而,仍有一大群患者内镜检查结果为阴性或检查失败,对于这些患者,需要采用其他技术来识别出血源。过去,导管血管造影和放射性核素红细胞标记技术是用于辅助识别胃肠道内出血源的首选“下一步”检查方法。然而,这些技术耗时且敏感性和特异性有限。此外,导管血管造影是一种相对具有侵入性的检查。近年来,计算机断层扫描(CT)在速度、分辨率、多平面技术和血管造影能力方面取得了重大技术进步。它能够很好地显示小肠和大肠,对许多胃肠道(GIT)出血原因进行精确的解剖学显示。此外,多期成像的最新进展现在允许直接观察肠道内的出血情况。因此,在许多中心,CT已成为急性情况下内镜检查结果为阴性或检查失败后识别GIT出血源的“下一步”技术。在这篇综述文章中,我们回顾了当前的文献,并讨论了CT作为一种检查GIT出血患者的方式的现状。