Suppr超能文献

基底动脉狭窄的对比增强经颅彩色编码双功超声检查标准

Contrast-enhanced transcranial color-coded duplex sonography criteria for basilar artery stenosis.

作者信息

Tateishi Yohei, Iguchi Yasuyuki, Kimura Kazumi, Inoue Takeshi, Shibazaki Kensaku, Eguchi Katsumi

机构信息

Department of Stroke Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.

出版信息

J Neuroimaging. 2008 Oct;18(4):407-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2007.00236.x. Epub 2008 May 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to assess contrast-enhanced transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (CE-TCCS) diagnosis of basilar artery (BA) stenosis.

METHODS

CE-TCCS and cerebral angiography were performed in 120 consecutive patients. The patients were angiographically divided into five groups: (1) intracranial arteries (ICA) stenosis but no BA stenosis as intracranial stenosis (ICS) group, (2) both ICA and BA stenoses as internal carotid arteay and basilar arteay stenoses (IBS) group, (3) BA stenosis as basilar artery stenosis (BAS) group, (4) BA occlusion as basilar artery occlusion (BAO) group, and (5) no arterial lesions as Control group. We compared the peak systolic flow velocity (PSV) of BA using CE-TCCS.

RESULTS

PSV was highest in the BAS group (n= 9, 206.1 +/- 118.6 cm/sec), followed by the ICS (n= 27, 74.9 +/- 36.1 cm/sec) and Control (n= 70, 58.2 +/- 17.3 cm/sec) groups. IBS group had two patients (PSV: 102 cm/sec and 167 cm/sec). Sensitivity-specificity curve analysis revealed a cutoff PSV of 120 cm/sec to distinguish the BAS group from other groups, and then we calculated sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 95%, positive predictive value of 64%, negative predictive value of 100%, and accuracy of 95%.

CONCLUSION

Measurement of PSV of the BA using CE-TCCS is useful for the identification of BA stenosis.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在评估对比增强经颅彩色编码双功能超声(CE-TCCS)对基底动脉(BA)狭窄的诊断价值。

方法

对120例连续患者进行CE-TCCS和脑血管造影检查。根据血管造影结果将患者分为五组:(1)颅内动脉(ICA)狭窄但无BA狭窄的颅内狭窄(ICS)组;(2)ICA和BA均狭窄的颈内动脉和基底动脉狭窄(IBS)组;(3)BA狭窄的基底动脉狭窄(BAS)组;(4)BA闭塞的基底动脉闭塞(BAO)组;(5)无动脉病变的对照组。我们使用CE-TCCS比较BA的收缩期峰值流速(PSV)。

结果

BAS组(n = 9,206.1±118.6 cm/秒)的PSV最高,其次是ICS组(n = 27,74.9±36.1 cm/秒)和对照组(n = 70,58.2±17.3 cm/秒)。IBS组有2例患者(PSV:102 cm/秒和167 cm/秒)。敏感性-特异性曲线分析显示,以120 cm/秒的PSV为界值可将BAS组与其他组区分开来,随后我们计算出敏感性为100%,特异性为95%,阳性预测值为64%,阴性预测值为100%,准确性为95%。

结论

使用CE-TCCS测量BA的PSV有助于识别BA狭窄。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验