Schweizer J, Kaulen R, Altmann E
Angiologische Abteilung der II. Medizinischen Klinik des Städtischen Klinikums, Dresden-Friedrichstadt.
Vasa. 1994;23(3):214-6.
One hundred and fifty-eight patients (99 men and 59 women) aged 20 to 76 years, all with extracranial cerebral artery stenoses, were submitted to both transcranial Doppler sonography and color-coded intracranial duplex sonography in order to establish whether there were any differences between the two methods in their assessment of the degree of severity of stenosis of the internal carotid artery and the resulting flow rate in the middle cerebral arteries. The degree of stenosis in the carotids was investigated with color duplex sonography and angiographically. Il emerged that transcranial Doppler sonography permitted reliable conclusions as to the severity of the carotid stenosis only in the case of complete occlusion. In contrast, the systolic flow rate in the trunk of the middle cerebral artery as measured by means of color intracranial duplex sonography consistently decreased with increasing severity of the stenosis. In this group of patients, color duplex sonography had clear advantages over angiography in the assessment of stenoses of the extracranial vessels supplying the brain. In particular, early stages of arteriosclerosis were detected more readily.
158例年龄在20至76岁之间的患者(99名男性和59名女性),均患有颅外脑动脉狭窄,他们同时接受了经颅多普勒超声检查和彩色编码颅内双功超声检查,以确定这两种方法在评估颈内动脉狭窄严重程度及由此导致的大脑中动脉血流速度方面是否存在差异。通过彩色双功超声检查和血管造影术对颈动脉狭窄程度进行了研究。结果发现,经颅多普勒超声检查仅在完全闭塞的情况下才能对颈动脉狭窄的严重程度得出可靠结论。相比之下,通过彩色颅内双功超声检查测量的大脑中动脉主干收缩期血流速度会随着狭窄严重程度的增加而持续下降。在这组患者中,彩色双功超声检查在评估供应大脑的颅外血管狭窄方面比血管造影术具有明显优势。特别是,更容易检测到动脉硬化的早期阶段。