Bellón Juan Angel, Rodríguez-Bayón Antonina, de Dios Luna Juan, Torres-González Francisco
El Palo Health Centre, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Málaga, Spain.
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 May;58(550):324-30. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X280182.
Frequent attenders to GP clinics can place an unnecessary burden on primary care. Interventions to reduce frequent attendance have had mixed results.
To assess the effectiveness of a GP intervention to reduce frequent-attender consultations.
Randomised controlled trial with frequent attenders divided into an intervention group and two control groups (one control group was seen by GPs also providing care to patients undergoing the intervention).
A health centre in southern Spain.
Six GPs and 209 randomly-selected frequent attenders participated. Three GPs were randomly allocated to perform the new intervention: of the 137 frequent attenders registered with these three GPs, 66 were randomly allocated to receive the intervention (IG) and 71 to a usual care control group (CG2). The other three GPs offered usual care to the other 72 frequent attenders (CG1). The main outcome measure was the total number of consultations 1 year post-intervention. Baseline measurements were recorded of sociodemographic characteristics, provider-user interface, chronic illnesses, and psychosocial variables. GPs allocated to the new intervention received 15 hours' training which incorporated biopsychosocial, organisational, and relational approaches. After 1 year of follow-up frequent attenders were contacted. An intention-to-treat analysis was used.
A multilevel model was built with three factors: time, patient, and doctor. After adjusting for covariates, the mean number of visits at 1 year in IG was 13.10 (95% confidence interval [CI]=11.39 to 14.94); in the CG1 group was 19.37 (95% CI=17.31 to 21.55); and in the CG2 group this was 16.72 (95% CI=4.84 to 18.72).
The new intervention with GPs resulted in a significant and relevant reduction in frequent-attender consultations. Although further trials are needed, this intervention is recommended to GPs interested in reducing consultations by their frequent attenders.
频繁就诊于全科医生诊所会给初级医疗带来不必要的负担。减少频繁就诊的干预措施效果不一。
评估全科医生干预措施对减少频繁就诊者咨询次数的有效性。
随机对照试验,将频繁就诊者分为干预组和两个对照组(一个对照组的患者也由为接受干预的患者提供治疗的全科医生诊治)。
西班牙南部的一个健康中心。
六名全科医生和209名随机选取的频繁就诊者参与研究。三名全科医生被随机分配实施新干预措施:在这三名全科医生登记的137名频繁就诊者中,66名被随机分配接受干预(干预组),71名被分配到常规护理对照组(对照组2)。另外三名全科医生为另外72名频繁就诊者提供常规护理(对照组1)。主要结局指标是干预后1年的咨询总次数。记录了社会人口学特征、医患界面、慢性病和心理社会变量的基线测量值。被分配实施新干预措施的全科医生接受了15小时的培训,培训内容包括生物心理社会、组织和人际关系方法。随访1年后联系频繁就诊者。采用意向性分析。
建立了一个包含时间、患者和医生三个因素 的多层次模型。调整协变量后,干预组1年时的平均就诊次数为13.10次(95%置信区间[CI]=11.39至14.94);对照组1组为19.37次(95%CI=17.31至21.55);对照组2组为16.72次(95%CI=4.84至18.72)。
全科医生实施的新干预措施使频繁就诊者的咨询次数显著且有意义地减少。尽管需要进一步试验,但建议有兴趣减少频繁就诊者咨询次数的全科医生采用这种干预措施。