Gruenwald Ilan, Leiba Ronit, Vardi Yoram
Neuro-urology unit, Rambam Health Care Campus and the Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel.
Eur Urol. 2009 Apr;55(4):969-76. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.048. Epub 2008 May 6.
In clinical practice, we commonly encounter sexually healthy males who use phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors and report a beneficial effect to their sex life.
In this study, we aimed to evaluate in a controlled manner the true effect of sildenafil 50 mg on the quality of sexual life (QSL) in a group of sexually active males who do not have erectile complaints.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study included sexually active middle-aged males who were never evaluated/treated for erectile dysfunction (ED) and who had an International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) Domain score > or = 22. The study included four visits in which subjects randomly received six tablets of sildenafil 50mg or placebo in a crossover manner.
Assessment of efficacy was performed by subjects filling out the following QSL questionnaires: the Self-Esteem and Relationship Questionnaire (SEAR), the IIEF, the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS), and additional questions regarding sexual performance (SAQ).
From a group of 65 screened subjects, 47 were eligible for analysis (28 without ED and 19 with mild ED). Average age was 52.1+/-10, mostly married (88%), with an IIEF-EF Domain score of 25.6+/-3.1. We found significant differences between the sildenafil vs placebo groups in the EDITS (70.8+/-18 vs 60.3+/-19, p=0.013), SEAR (57.6+/-1 vs 51+/-1. p<0.0001), and IIEF-EF Domain score (25.1+/-4.8 vs 23+/-5.3, p=0.013). All of our structured questionnaires showed significant improvement in the treated group. We did not find significant differences between the groups in the total IIEF score. We also performed individual analysis in the subgroup of subjects (mild ED vs normal EF), and no significant differences were demonstrated in the results of these groups with regard to total scores on all questionnaires employed.
This is the first placebo-controlled study performed on a selected group of individuals suggesting that middle-aged subjects without complaints of ED may have real benefit when using sildenafil. This study provides some preliminary data regarding the use of a phosphoesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5-I) in this unexplored population, but more data are needed in order to seriously consider extending their use in these males and perhaps in the younger population.
在临床实践中,我们经常遇到性健康的男性使用5型磷酸二酯酶(PDE5)抑制剂,并报告其对性生活有有益影响。
在本研究中,我们旨在以对照方式评估50毫克西地那非对一组没有勃起功能障碍主诉的性活跃男性的性生活质量(QSL)的真实效果。
设计、设置和参与者:这项前瞻性、安慰剂对照、双盲、交叉研究纳入了性活跃的中年男性,这些男性从未接受过勃起功能障碍(ED)的评估/治疗,且国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)勃起功能(EF)领域得分≥22。该研究包括四次就诊,受试者以交叉方式随机接受六片50毫克西地那非或安慰剂。
通过受试者填写以下QSL问卷进行疗效评估:自尊与关系问卷(SEAR)、IIEF、治疗满意度勃起功能障碍量表(EDITS)以及关于性表现的附加问题(SAQ)。
在65名筛查受试者中,47名符合分析条件(28名无ED,19名有轻度ED)。平均年龄为52.1±10岁,大多数已婚(88%),IIEF-EF领域得分为25.6±3.1。我们发现西地那非组与安慰剂组在EDITS(70.8±18对60.3±19,p=0.013)、SEAR(57.6±1对51±1,p<0.0001)和IIEF-EF领域得分(25.1±4.8对23±5.3,p=0.013)方面存在显著差异。我们所有的结构化问卷都显示治疗组有显著改善。我们未发现两组在IIEF总分上有显著差异。我们还在受试者亚组(轻度ED与正常EF)中进行了个体分析,在所有使用的问卷总分方面,这些组的结果未显示出显著差异。
这是首次对一组选定个体进行的安慰剂对照研究,表明无ED主诉的中年受试者使用西地那非可能有实际益处。本研究提供了一些关于在这一未探索人群中使用5型磷酸酯酶抑制剂(PDE5-I)的初步数据,但需要更多数据才能认真考虑将其应用范围扩大到这些男性以及可能更年轻的人群。