Suppr超能文献

单侧忽视中对“相同”物体的视觉与想象

Seeing and imagining the "same" objects in unilateral neglect.

作者信息

Bourlon Clémence, Pradat-Diehl Pascale, Duret Christophe, Azouvi Philippe, Bartolomeo Paolo

机构信息

INSERM UMR_S 610, IFR 70, Pavillon Claude Bernard, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47 bd de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2008 Aug;46(10):2602-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.04.002. Epub 2008 Apr 10.

Abstract

Dissociations between perceptual and imaginal neglect are typically investigated by using very different tasks (e.g. visual target cancellation vs. place descriptions). Here we report patients' performance on imaginal and perceptual tasks which shared identical stimuli and procedure, except for the modality of stimulus presentation. In different tasks, participants either saw towns/regions on a map of France or heard their names, and pressed one of two keys according to the stimulus location (left or right of Paris). Neglect patients as a group were less accurate for left-sided stimuli in both modalities, but on single-case analysis only one patient with perceptual neglect had asymmetrical imaginal accuracy. These results confirmed that imaginal neglect is relatively rare, and is usually associated with perceptual neglect. Perceptual neglect resulted more frequent and severe than imaginal neglect, also when assessed using strictly comparable tests, consistent with the exogenous orienting bias typically observed in these patients.

摘要

知觉性忽视和想象性忽视之间的分离通常通过使用非常不同的任务来进行研究(例如视觉目标消除与地点描述)。在此我们报告患者在想象性任务和知觉性任务中的表现,这些任务除了刺激呈现的方式外,共享相同的刺激和程序。在不同任务中,参与者要么在法国地图上看到城镇/地区,要么听到它们的名字,并根据刺激位置(巴黎的左侧或右侧)按下两个键之一。作为一个群体,忽视患者在两种模式下对左侧刺激的反应准确性都较低,但在单病例分析中,只有一名患有知觉性忽视的患者在想象方面存在不对称的准确性。这些结果证实,想象性忽视相对罕见,并且通常与知觉性忽视相关。当使用严格可比的测试进行评估时,知觉性忽视比想象性忽视更频繁、更严重,这与这些患者中通常观察到的外源性定向偏差一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验