Williams Lindy J, Kernot Jocelyn, Hillier Susan L, Loetscher Tobias
Cognitive Aging and Impairment Neurosciences Lab, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Innovation IMPlementation and Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Front Neurol. 2021 Nov 24;12:742365. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.742365. eCollection 2021.
The objective of this scoping review was to capture the reported definitions for the subtypes of neglect post stroke and map the range of assessment tools employed for each neglect subtype. EMBASE, Emcare, Medline, and psychINFO were searched from database inception. Searching included all allied terms and mesh headings for stroke, spatial neglect, measurement, screening tools, psychometric properties. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion. Primary studies with documented protocols of a spatial neglect tool for adults post stroke, with some aspect of validity or reliability were included. Two reviewers independently reviewed the documented protocols of each tool to determine the underlying subtypes and disagreements were resolved through discussion. There were 371 articles included with 292 tools used for the screening or diagnosis of neglect. The majority of studies (67%) included a tool that did not specify the neglect subtype being assessed, therefore an analysis of the underlying subtypes for each tool is presented. There is no consistency with the terms used to refer to the syndrome of spatial neglect with over 200 different terms used within the included studies to refer to the syndrome as a whole or one of its subtypes. It is essential to unify the terminology and definition for each neglect subtype. There are hundreds of neglect tools available, however many are not able to differentiate presenting subtypes. It is important for clinicians and researchers to critically evaluate the neglect tools being used for the screening and diagnosis of neglect.
本综述的目的是梳理已报道的中风后忽视亚型的定义,并梳理用于每种忽视亚型的评估工具范围。从数据库建立起就对EMBASE、Emcare、Medline和psychINFO进行了检索。检索包括中风、空间忽视、测量、筛查工具、心理测量特性的所有相关术语和主题词。两名评审员独立筛选纳入研究。纳入了记录有针对中风后成人空间忽视工具方案且具有有效性或可靠性某些方面的原始研究。两名评审员独立审查每个工具的记录方案以确定潜在亚型,分歧通过讨论解决。共纳入371篇文章,其中292种工具用于忽视的筛查或诊断。大多数研究(67%)纳入的工具未明确所评估的忽视亚型,因此本文对每种工具的潜在亚型进行了分析。在所纳入研究中,用于指代空间忽视综合征的术语不一致,有200多个不同术语用于指代整个综合征或其亚型之一。统一每种忽视亚型的术语和定义至关重要。有数百种忽视工具可供使用,但许多工具无法区分呈现的亚型。临床医生和研究人员批判性评估用于忽视筛查和诊断的工具非常重要。