Suppr超能文献

为什么用肉眼或通常的二维视频分析都很难检测到非法投球的板球投球。

Why it is difficult to detect an illegally bowled cricket delivery with either the naked eye or usual two-dimensional video analysis.

机构信息

Centre for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2010 May;44(6):420-5. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.047266. Epub 2008 May 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In this study, the influence of various anatomical and biomechanical factors on the ability to detect the magnitude of elbow extension during the cricket bowling action, with either the naked eye or from conventional two-dimensional video footage was evaluated.

DESIGN

Descriptive study

SETTING

One male bowler who had a large carrying angle was studied by means of a three-dimensional biomechanical analysis using the Vicon MX13 motion analysis system when bowling at match pace. Photographs were taken from various angles during the bowling delivery action to illustrate factors influencing the visual appearance of an illegal delivery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The influence of extension of the elbow joint and the elbow's anatomically fixed position, known as the "carrying angle", on the visual perception of an illegal ("thrown") delivery were the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

The elbow joint rotates about 90 degrees as a result of humeral rotation during the movement of shoulder circumduction produced by the bowler's delivery action. This causes the plane in which the elbow joint moves to change throughout the delivery action. This movement will also vary between bowlers. The movement of elbow planar flexion/extension can be viewed only when the viewer's eyes are at exactly 90u to the plane of elbow joint movement. Thus, a cricket umpire wishing to detect elbow extension during the bowler's delivery action would need continuously to change his viewing position as the bowler's arm moved from the horizontal to the vertical position at ball release. We show that by viewing the action from only one position, the umpire will be confused by the illusion of a "throw" produced by a large "carrying angle" in some bowlers.

CONCLUSION

It is impossible for an umpire conclusively to cite a bowler for an illegal action based only on naked eye observation. To do this the umpire would need to be in at least three different positions throughout a single delivery. Similarly, video footage shot from at least three different angles during the bowler's delivery action would need to be viewed by the match referee. By viewing the delivery from only one position, the visual illusion of a "throw" will be created by the presence of a large "carrying angle".

摘要

目的

在这项研究中,评估了各种解剖学和生物力学因素对裸眼或从传统二维视频中检测板球投球动作中肘部伸展程度的影响。

设计

描述性研究

设置

一名男性投球手在比赛速度下使用 Vicon MX13 运动分析系统进行三维生物力学分析时,具有较大携带角度。在投球投递动作过程中,从各个角度拍摄照片,说明影响非法投递视觉外观的因素。

主要观察指标

主要观察指标是肘关节伸展程度和肘部解剖固定位置(称为“携带角度”)对非法(“投掷”)投递视觉感知的影响。

结果

由于投球手的投球动作产生的肩环转运动使肱骨旋转,导致肘关节旋转约 90 度。这导致在整个投球动作过程中,肘关节移动的平面发生变化。这种运动也会在投球手之间有所不同。只有当观察者的眼睛与肘关节运动平面成 90 度时,才能观察到手肘平面屈伸的运动。因此,板球裁判员要在投球手投球时检测肘部伸展,需要随着投球手手臂从水平位置移动到垂直位置,不断改变自己的观察位置。我们发现,裁判员只从一个位置观察动作,会被一些投球手较大的“携带角度”产生的“投掷”错觉所混淆。

结论

裁判员仅凭肉眼观察不可能根据单一动作就确定投球手的非法行为。为此,裁判员需要在整个投球过程中至少处于三个不同的位置。同样,裁判员需要观看投球手投球过程中至少三个不同角度拍摄的视频片段。如果只从一个位置观察投球,较大的“携带角度”会产生“投掷”的视觉错觉。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验