Andrade B Ramírez, Salama A A K, Caja G, Castillo V, Albanell E, Such X
Grup de Recerca en Remugants, Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Jun;91(6):2299-306. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0687.
Lactation artificially induced (ART) by steroid hormones and natural lactation (NAT) after lambing were compared in 2 dairy sheep breeds (Manchega and Lacaune) in 2 experiments conducted during winter and spring. In experiment 1, ART ewes (14 Manchega and 9 Lacaune) were induced into lactation in winter by the standard protocol, which consisted of s.c. injections of estradiol and progesterone administered in 2 portions daily from d 1 to 7. Hydrocortisone acetate was injected s.c. daily on d 18 to 20. Milking was initiated on d 21 and continued for 13 wk. A similar group of NAT ewes was selected for the contemporary comparison of NAT vs. ART lactation. All Lacaune ewes, but only 3 of the 14 Manchega ewes (21%), were successfully induced into lactation. Despite the successful induction of lactation in Lacaune ewes, milk yield was much lower than that obtained in NAT lactation (1.23 +/- 0.14 vs. 2.51 +/- 0.15 L/ d). Milk composition from wk 5 to 13 did not differ between groups, except for whey protein, which was greater in ART than in NAT ewes (1.47 vs. 1.25%). In experiment 2, 19 Manchega ewes were divided into 2 groups and induced into lactation in spring by using the standard induction protocol, similar to that used in experiment 1 (control, n = 9), or the standard protocol modified with bovine somatotropin (bST, 250 mg/ewe on d 11; n = 10). Manchega ewes had an improved response to the standard protocol of lactation induction in spring compared with winter. Milk yield in bST-treated Manchega ewes was 98% greater than that in control ewes (402 +/- 85 vs. 203 +/- 86 mL/d). The use of bST during mammogenesis did not affect milk composition. In conclusion, marked differences between Manchega and Lacaune dairy ewes were observed in their response to lactation induction when using the standard protocol during different photoperiod conditions. The Manchega ewes were unable to establish lactation in winter but were able to do so in spring. The response to lactation induction in dairy ewes seems to be related to their endogenous levels of prolactin and growth hormone, the use of which should be explored more deeply in future research.
在冬季和春季进行的两项实验中,对两个奶羊品种(曼彻格羊和拉库纳羊)通过类固醇激素人工诱导泌乳(ART)和产羔后的自然泌乳(NAT)进行了比较。在实验1中,ART母羊(14只曼彻格羊和9只拉库纳羊)在冬季通过标准方案诱导泌乳,该方案包括从第1天到第7天每天分两次皮下注射雌二醇和孕酮。在第18天到第20天每天皮下注射醋酸氢化可的松。在第21天开始挤奶,并持续13周。选择一组类似的NAT母羊用于同期比较NAT与ART泌乳。所有拉库纳母羊均成功诱导泌乳,但14只曼彻格母羊中只有3只(21%)成功诱导泌乳。尽管拉库纳母羊成功诱导泌乳,但产奶量远低于NAT泌乳(1.23±0.14对2.51±0.15升/天)。从第5周到第13周,两组之间的乳成分没有差异,但乳清蛋白除外,ART母羊的乳清蛋白含量高于NAT母羊(1.47%对1.25%)。在实验2中,将19只曼彻格母羊分为两组,并在春季通过使用与实验1相同的标准诱导方案(对照组,n = 9)或用牛生长激素(bST,第11天每只母羊250毫克;n = 10)改良的标准方案诱导泌乳。与冬季相比,曼彻格母羊在春季对标准泌乳诱导方案的反应有所改善。bST处理的曼彻格母羊的产奶量比对照母羊高98%(402±85对203±86毫升/天)。在乳腺发育过程中使用bST不影响乳成分。总之,在不同光周期条件下使用标准方案时,观察到曼彻格羊和拉库纳奶羊对泌乳诱导的反应存在显著差异。曼彻格母羊在冬季无法建立泌乳,但在春季能够建立。奶羊对泌乳诱导的反应似乎与其内源性催乳素和生长激素水平有关,未来研究应更深入地探讨其应用。