Morrissey A D, Cameron A W N, Tilbrook A J
Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia.
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Nov;91(11):4238-43. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0918.
In Australia, the supply of sheep milk is reduced during the winter. Housing dairy animals under lights during winter is a simple technique to increase milk yield; however, it is difficult to predict the magnitude of this increase in dairy ewes, because there are few corroborating data. We studied 220 East Friesian crossbred ewes (50 primiparous and 170 multiparous ewes, respectively) that lambed in April to May 2007 (late autumn, southern hemisphere) and were weaned from their lambs within 24 h of parturition and milked exclusively by machine. These ewes were ranked according to their milk production, and ewes producing > or =1,000 mL/d of milk were allocated to 1 of 2 groups. One group of ewes was kept indoors under a long-day photoperiod (16 h of light), whereas the other group was kept indoors under a naturally declining day length. Ewes were maintained under these conditions for 8 wk. Milk yield was measured twice weekly, and ewe weight and condition were measured at weekly intervals. From a subset of ewes (n = 20 per group), milk samples were collected twice weekly at the morning milking to measure milk lipid, protein, and lactose, and blood samples were collected once a week to measure plasma prolactin concentrations. Mean daily milk yield was analyzed as a percentage of preexperimental milk yield because the milk yield of ewes housed under the long photoperiod was lower than that of ewes under a declining day length when the treatments began. Thus, the ewes under a long photoperiod yielded 91.7% of their starting yield by wk 8 of treatment, whereas ewes under a declining day length yielded 76.25% of their initial value (LSD = 5.1), and this divergence in milk yield was apparent by wk 2 of treatment. Mean plasma prolactin levels were greater in ewes housed under the long-day photoperiod (n = 20) compared with control ewes (n = 20) at wk 6 (168 +/- 27 vs. 72 +/- 19 ng/mL, respectively), wk 7 (125 +/- 28 vs. 37 +/- 7 ng/mL, respectively), and wk 8 of the experiment (132 +/- 35 vs. 31 +/- 7 ng/mL, respectively). The composition of the milk was similar between the groups at each time point, and milk from these ewes (n = 20 per group) contained, on average, 6.1 +/- 0.05% lipid, 4.8 +/- 0.02% protein, and 5.4 +/- 0.01% lactose (n = 309 samples). We concluded that ewes increase milk production in response to being housed under a long-day photoperiod during winter.
在澳大利亚,冬季羊奶供应量会减少。冬季在光照条件下饲养奶牛是一种提高产奶量的简单技术;然而,对于奶用母羊产奶量增加的幅度很难预测,因为相关的确证数据很少。我们研究了220只东弗里生杂交母羊(分别为50只初产母羊和170只经产母羊),这些母羊于2007年4月至5月产羔(南半球深秋),产羔后24小时内与其羔羊分开,并仅用机器挤奶。这些母羊根据产奶量进行排名,日产奶量≥1000毫升的母羊被分为两组中的一组。一组母羊饲养在室内,光照周期为长日照(16小时光照),而另一组母羊饲养在室内,日照时长自然递减。母羊在这些条件下饲养8周。每周测量两次产奶量,每周测量一次母羊体重和膘情。从一部分母羊(每组n = 20只)中,每周两次在早晨挤奶时采集奶样,以测量奶中的脂质、蛋白质和乳糖含量,每周采集一次血样以测量血浆催乳素浓度。由于处理开始时,长光照周期下饲养的母羊产奶量低于日照时长递减条件下饲养的母羊,因此将日均产奶量分析为实验前产奶量的百分比。因此,到处理第8周时,长光照周期下的母羊产奶量为起始产量的91.7%,而日照时长递减条件下的母羊产奶量为初始值的76.25%(最小显著差 = 5.1),这种产奶量差异在处理第2周时就很明显。在实验的第6周(分别为168±27与72±19纳克/毫升)、第7周(分别为125±28与37±7纳克/毫升)和第8周(分别为132±35与31±7纳克/毫升),长日照光照周期下饲养的母羊(n = 20只)的平均血浆催乳素水平高于对照母羊(n = 20只)。各时间点两组奶的成分相似,这些母羊(每组n = 20只)的奶平均含有6.1±0.05%的脂质、4.8±0.02%的蛋白质和5.4±0.01%的乳糖(n = 309个样本)。我们得出结论,冬季将母羊饲养在长日照光照周期下会使其产奶量增加。