Suppr超能文献

德国绝经后骨质疏松症筛查与治疗策略的成本效益

Cost effectiveness of the German screen-and-treat strategy for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

作者信息

Mueller Dirk, Weyler Eva, Gandjour Afschin

机构信息

Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(6):513-36. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826060-00005.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The German osteology umbrella organization, Dachverband Osteologie (DVO), has published a new guideline for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures. According to the guideline, women are screened using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Those with an absolute 10-year fracture risk > or =30% are treated with bisphosphonates such as alendronate or risedronate for 4 years or with teriparatide for 18 months.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost effectiveness of the screen-and-treat strategy versus no intervention in women of the general population aged 50-90 years in Germany.

METHODS

Cost-utility and budget-impact analyses were performed from the perspective of the statutory health insurance (SHI). A Markov model with a 1-year cycle length simulated costs and benefits (QALYs), discounted at 3%, over a lifetime horizon. The number of women correctly diagnosed by pre-tests and DXA as having a 10-year fracture risk of > or =30% was estimated for different age groups (50-60, 60-70, 70-80 and 80-90 years). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated; all costs are presented in euro, year 2006 values. Robustness of the results was tested by a probabilistic Monte Carlo simulation.

RESULTS

Alendronate was the most cost-effective drug in all age groups; the ICERs were euro 3849, euro 16 589, euro 6600 and euro 2337 per QALY for 50-, 60-, 70- and 80-year-old women, respectively, followed by risedronate. Teriparatide was dominated in every age group. Implementing the screen-and-treat strategy would result in annual costs of euro 175 million for alendronate (euro 181 million for risedronate) or 0.14% of the SHI annual budget. Results were robust in the sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSION

While the screen-and-treat strategy would result in a substantial cost increase for the SHI, the use of alendronate within such a strategy appears cost effective when compared with many generally accepted medical interventions.

摘要

背景

德国骨科学伞状组织,德国骨科学联合会(DVO),发布了一项骨质疏松性骨折二级预防的新指南。根据该指南,使用双能X线吸收法(DXA)对女性进行筛查。那些绝对10年骨折风险≥30%的患者,使用阿仑膦酸钠或利塞膦酸钠等双膦酸盐治疗4年,或使用特立帕肽治疗18个月。

目的

确定在德国50 - 90岁普通女性人群中,筛查与治疗策略相对于不干预的成本效益。

方法

从法定医疗保险(SHI)的角度进行成本效用和预算影响分析。一个周期长度为1年的马尔可夫模型模拟了成本和效益(质量调整生命年),在整个生命周期内按3%进行贴现。估计了不同年龄组(50 - 60岁、60 - 70岁、70 - 80岁和80 - 90岁)中通过预测试和DXA正确诊断为10年骨折风险≥30%的女性人数。计算了增量成本效益比(ICER);所有成本均以2006年欧元价值表示。通过概率蒙特卡罗模拟测试了结果的稳健性。

结果

在所有年龄组中,阿仑膦酸钠是最具成本效益的药物;50岁、60岁、70岁和80岁女性每获得一个质量调整生命年的ICER分别为3849欧元、16589欧元、6600欧元和2337欧元,其次是利塞膦酸钠。特立帕肽在每个年龄组中均占劣势。实施筛查与治疗策略将导致阿仑膦酸钠的年度成本为1.75亿欧元(利塞膦酸钠为1.81亿欧元),占法定医疗保险年度预算的0.14%。在敏感性分析中结果稳健。

结论

虽然筛查与治疗策略会导致法定医疗保险成本大幅增加,但与许多普遍接受的医疗干预措施相比,在该策略中使用阿仑膦酸钠似乎具有成本效益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验