Sevdalis Nick, Forrest Damien, Undre Shabnam, Darzi Ara, Vincent Charles
Clinical Safety Research Unit, Department of Bio-Surgery & Surgical Technology, Imperial College, 10th floor, QEQM, St. Mary's Hospital, South Wharf Road, London, W2 1NY, UK.
World J Surg. 2008 Aug;32(8):1643-50. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9624-7.
Recent studies have investigated disruptions to surgical process via observation. We developed the Disruptions in Surgery Index (DiSI) to assess operating room professionals' self-perceptions of disruptions that affect surgical processes.
The DiSI assesses individual issues, operating room environment, communication, coordination/situational awareness, patient-related disruptions, team cohesion, and organizational issues. Sixteen surgeons, 26 nurses, and 20 anesthetists/operating departmental practitioners participated. Participants judged for themselves and for their colleagues how often each disruption occurs, its contribution to error, and obstruction of surgical goals.
We combined the team cohesion and organizational disruptions to improve reliability. All participants judged that individual issues, operating room environment, and communication issues affect others more often and more severely than one's self. Surgeons reported significantly fewer disruptions than nurses or anesthetists.
Although operating room professionals acknowledged disruptions and their impact, they attributed disruptions related to individual performance and attitudes more to their colleagues than to themselves. The cross-professional discrepancy in perceived disruptions (surgeons perceiving fewer than the other two groups) suggests that attempts to improve the surgical environment should always start with thorough assessment of the views of all its users. DiSI is useful in that it differentiates between the frequency and the severity of disruptions. Further research should explore correlations of DiSI-assessed perceptions and other observable measures.
近期研究通过观察调查了手术过程中的干扰因素。我们开发了手术干扰指数(DiSI),以评估手术室专业人员对影响手术过程的干扰因素的自我认知。
DiSI评估个体问题、手术室环境、沟通、协调/态势感知、患者相关干扰、团队凝聚力和组织问题。16名外科医生、26名护士和20名麻醉师/手术室从业者参与其中。参与者对自己和同事判断每种干扰因素发生的频率、其对错误的影响以及对手术目标的阻碍程度。
我们将团队凝聚力和组织干扰因素合并以提高可靠性。所有参与者都认为,个体问题、手术室环境和沟通问题对他人的影响比对自己的影响更频繁、更严重。外科医生报告的干扰因素明显少于护士或麻醉师。
尽管手术室专业人员承认存在干扰因素及其影响,但他们将与个体表现和态度相关的干扰因素更多地归因于同事而非自己。在感知到的干扰因素方面存在跨专业差异(外科医生感知到的干扰因素少于其他两组),这表明改善手术环境的尝试应始终从全面评估所有使用者的观点开始。DiSI的有用之处在于它区分了干扰因素的频率和严重程度。进一步的研究应探索DiSI评估的认知与其他可观察指标之间的相关性。