Suppr超能文献

大规模伤亡事件分诊:采用循证方法的时候了。

Mass-casualty triage: time for an evidence-based approach.

作者信息

Jenkins Jennifer Lee, McCarthy Melissa L, Sauer Lauren M, Green Gary B, Stuart Stephanie, Thomas Tamara L, Hsu Edbert B

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21209, USA.

出版信息

Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008 Jan-Feb;23(1):3-8. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00005471.

Abstract

Mass-casualty triage has developed from a wartime necessity to a civilian tool to ensure that constrained medical resources are directed at achieving the greatest good for the most number of people. Several primary and secondary triage tools have been developed, including Simple Treatment and Rapid Transport (START), JumpSTART, Care Flight Triage, Triage Sieve, Sacco Triage Method, Secondary Assessment of Victim Endpoint (SAVE), and Pediatric Triage Tape. Evidence to support the use of one triage algorithm over another is limited, and the development of effective triage protocols is an important research priority. The most widely recognized mass-casualty triage algorithms in use today are not evidence-based, and no studies directly address these issues in the mass-casualty setting. Furthermore, no studies have evaluated existing mass-casualty triage algorithms regarding ease of use, reliability, and validity when biological, chemical, or radiological agents are introduced. Currently, the lack of a standardized mass-casualty triage system that is well validated, reliable, and uniformly accepted, remains an important gap. Future research directed at triage is recognized as a necessity, and the development of a practical, universal, triage algorithm that incorporates requirements for decontamination or special precautions for infectious agents would facilitate a more organized mass-casualty medical response.

摘要

大规模伤亡事件分诊已从战时的一种必要手段发展成为一种民用工具,以确保有限的医疗资源能够用于为尽可能多的人带来最大益处。已经开发了几种主要和次要的分诊工具,包括简单治疗与快速转运(START)、JumpSTART、Care Flight分诊、分诊筛检法、萨科分诊法、受害者终点二次评估(SAVE)以及儿科分诊胶带。支持使用一种分诊算法而非另一种的证据有限,制定有效的分诊方案是一项重要的研究重点。当今使用的最广为人知的大规模伤亡事件分诊算法并非基于证据,而且没有研究在大规模伤亡事件背景下直接解决这些问题。此外,没有研究评估在引入生物、化学或放射性制剂时现有大规模伤亡事件分诊算法在易用性、可靠性和有效性方面的情况。目前,缺乏一个经过充分验证、可靠且被普遍接受的标准化大规模伤亡事件分诊系统,这仍然是一个重要差距。针对分诊的未来研究被认为是必要的,开发一种结合去污要求或针对传染源的特殊预防措施的实用、通用的分诊算法,将有助于更有序地应对大规模伤亡事件的医疗需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验