Suppr超能文献

将黄疸的视觉评估作为检测显著新生儿高胆红素血症的筛查工具是否可靠?

Is visual assessment of jaundice reliable as a screening tool to detect significant neonatal hyperbilirubinemia?

作者信息

Riskin Arieh, Tamir Ada, Kugelman Amir, Hemo Miri, Bader David

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2008 Jun;152(6):782-7, 787.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.11.003. Epub 2008 Jan 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the reliability of visual assessment of bilirubin levels (BiliEye) in newborns as a screening tool to detect significant neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.

STUDY DESIGN

5 neonatologists and 17 nurses estimated 3,532 BiliEye in 1,129 term and late preterm (> or = 35 weeks) infants before discharge from the nursery, at 62 +/- 24 hours. Total serum bilirubin (TSB) levels were measured concomitantly.

RESULTS

Mean TSB and BiliEye were 6.7 +/- 2.9 mg/dL (range, 0.4-18.2 mg/dL) and 6.6 +/- 3.2 mg/dL (range, 0.0-17.2 mg/dL), respectively, with good correlation (Pearson's r = 0.752, P < .0001), but other measures of agreement were poor. 61.5% of the 109 babies with TSB levels in high-risk zones were clinically misclassified. The area under curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristics plotted for these high-risk zones was 0.825, but became low for early discharge (< or = 36 hours; AUC = 0.638) and late preterm (35-37 weeks; AUC = 0.613). There was significant interobserver variation (low weighted kappa, 0.363).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was good correlation between BiliEye and actual TSB level, visual assessment was unreliable as a screening tool to detect significant neonatal hyperbilirubinemia before discharge. Babies with TSB levels within high-risk zones may be clinically misdiagnosed as low-risk, resulting in inadequate follow-up.

摘要

目的

评估新生儿胆红素水平视觉评估法(BiliEye)作为检测显著新生儿高胆红素血症筛查工具的可靠性。

研究设计

5名新生儿科医生和17名护士在1129名足月儿和晚期早产儿(≥35周)出院前62±24小时对其3532次BiliEye进行了评估。同时测量了总血清胆红素(TSB)水平。

结果

平均TSB和BiliEye分别为6.7±2.9mg/dL(范围0.4 - 18.2mg/dL)和6.6±3.2mg/dL(范围0.0 - 17.2mg/dL),具有良好的相关性(Pearson相关系数r = 0.752,P <.0001),但其他一致性指标较差。109名TSB水平处于高危区域的婴儿中有61.5%在临床上被错误分类。针对这些高危区域绘制的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.825,但对于早期出院(≤36小时;AUC = 0.638)和晚期早产(35 - 37周;AUC = 0.613)时该值较低。观察者间存在显著差异(加权kappa值低,为0.363)。

结论

尽管BiliEye与实际TSB水平之间存在良好的相关性,但视觉评估作为出院前检测显著新生儿高胆红素血症的筛查工具并不可靠。TSB水平处于高危区域的婴儿可能在临床上被误诊为低风险,从而导致随访不足。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验